(Page 5 of 15)
p> ROMNEY VERSUS THE REVIVAL br> Re: Richard Kirk's Hewitt's Mitt : /p> p>One way to avoid the difficulties of a Mormon in the White House, or in a Presidential campaign, is to not vote for Mitt Romney in the primaries and thus avoid the problem altogether. He's not necessary -- Tommy Thompson, Fred Thompson, Gingrich, Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo -- there are plenty of true conservatives that are running or want to run. Then again, since Romney may be a liberal, there are plenty of liberals that are running, such as Giuliani and McCain, with more cross-over appeal. What do we need or want Romney for? And as a Christian I think a revival of Christ in the United States is far more important than four years of any Presidency. In fact, I think a single soul won or lost for Christ is more important than the Presidency. I won't support or vote for a Mormon for President because I believe it would interfere with a Christian revival, that I see happening, and in fact it will help a Mormon revival when the growth in their church has finally stagnated. br> -- Greg F br> Delray Beach Florida /p> p> PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS br> Re: Lawrence Henry's Darned Right, Damn This Traffic Jam
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.