The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Snap Judgments

Select enemy material. More Vietnams. Not liking Mitt. Paved subsidies. Fear of China. Plus much more.

(Page 4 of 15)

/p> p> NO MORE VIETNAMS br> Re: Mark Tooley's "Lessons From Vietnam" : /p>

Conspicuously absent from most articles concerning what might have been if only the United States had stayed in Vietnam is any attempt to assess how long we would have had to remain and at what cost in human lives and national treasure. Monday morning quarterbacking is always a gratifying activity. We are confident that our alternative scenario would have led to a more desirable conclusion. Of course, we have the luxury of never having our alternative tested.

One lesson from Vietnam and Iraq that is rarely, if ever, discussed is that the American public quickly becomes wary and restive when the administration lies, obfuscates or misrepresents about the reasons for war and/or the progress of the war. Both political parties have proven to be adept at lying, obfuscating and misrepresenting.

During Vietnam, the draft and taxes were two of the many reasons why public support for the war waned, but neither applies today. Perhaps this will be a subject for future generations to think about when they contemplate the "lessons from Iraq."

p>Also, why so much concern for the people in Southeast Asia who fell under the tyranny of communism and the people of Iraq who lived under the tyranny of Saddam Hussein and so little for the people of Darfur? I guess it's more gratifying to castigate our political enemies than it is to develop and pursue a consistent moral philosophy. br> -- Mike Roush br> North Carolina /p>
Page: ‹ First   2 34 5 6   Last ›

topics:
Taxes, Foreign Policy, Trade, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Business, Earmarks, Social Security, Abortion, Constitution, Law, Supreme Court, Military, Iraq, Iran, Israel, NATO, Socialism, Communism, Immigration

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2007/05/14/snap-judgments
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT