By Lisa Fabrizio on 4.11.07 @ 12:07AM
This Sunday, April 15, Major League Baseball will celebrate Jackie Robinson Day by commemorating the 60th anniversary of the breaking of the game's color barrier. In my hometown of Stamford, CT, where he spent the last twelve years of his life, there is a statue of Robinson which calls to mind the annual jazz festivals he held at his home to raise money for civil rights causes and the dignity of the man himself.
Much has been written of Robinson's storied career and the obstacles he faced with much courage throughout his life in baseball. Often ignored -- in the manner of a particularly annoying relative -- are his political views. Why is this? Because, although he was aligned with many of the giants of the civil rights movement, he was his own man. A man whose beliefs spoke to what many today would consider some inconvenient truths.
John Roosevelt Robinson was, in the most literal sense, a
Rockefeller Republican whose party affiliation should be a reminder
that it was the Democrats of the South, the Dixiecrats, who stood
in the Congressional doorway of racial integration. He was an
anti-Communist and an ardent capitalist who believed\ that, given the chance, racial equality might
be advanced through hard work:
How much more effective our demands for a piece of the action would be if we were negotiating from the strength of our own self reliance rather than stating our case in the role of a beggar or someone out for charity. We live in a materialistic society in which money doesn't only talk â€" it screams.
He thought Malcolm X a talented man with a message of promise but disdained his philosophy of hate. He castigated him for suggesting that blacks like U.N. Ambassador Ralph Bunche had "sold out," saying, "Malcolm is very militant on Harlem street corners where militancy is not dangerous," but that he lacked "one-twentieth of the integrity and leadership" of a man like Bunche.
And, in a quote you're not likely to read every day, he later chastised his friend King for his opposition to the Vietnam War saying, "Why is it, Martin, that you seem to ignore the blood which is upon [Communist] hands and to speak only of the 'guilt' of the United States?"
One of his most notorious clashes came with Paul Robeson, the famous black activist, athlete, and basso profundo who was a well-known devotee of Josef Stalin, which earned him the Lenin Peace Prize in 1952. In 1949 he declared before a leftist audience in Paris: "It is unthinkable that American Negroes would go to war on behalf of those who have oppressed us for generations against a country [the Soviet Union] which in one generation has raised our people to the full dignity of mankind."
After Robeson became a target of those who recognized the threat
posed to the U.S. by Soviet Communism, Jackie Robinson testified
before the House Committee on Un-American Activities where he
predicted (correctly, of course) that blacks would, "do their best
to help their country win the war against Russia or any other enemy
that threatened us." Although later in life he wrote that he
regretted it, he honed in on Robeson almost poetically:
I can't speak for any 15,000,000 people any more than any other one person can, but I know that I've got too much invested for my wife and child and myself in the future of this country, and I and other Americans of many races and faiths have too much invested in our country's welfare, for any of us to throw it away because of a siren song sung in bass.
But that doesn't mean that we're going to stop fighting race discrimination in this country until we've got it licked. It means that we're going to fight it all the harder because our stake in the future is so big. We can win our fight without the Communists and we don't want their help.
topics:
Sports, Constitution, Russia, Communism
Home |About |Contributors |Advertise |Donate |Privacy Policy |Contact
The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.
© 2012 Copyright, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.