By James Bowman on 3.30.07 @ 12:02AM
Chris Rock almost gets Eric Rohmer right.
Odd couples do not get much odder than Eric Rohmer and Chris
Rock, but the latter's new film, I Think I Love My Wife,
is based on one of the classic Six Moral Tales by the French genius
and master of cinematic subtlety, L'amour l'apres midi
(released in America as Chloe in the Afternoon) of 1972.
Whatever else you may say about Chris Rock, he's not exactly
subtle. Moreover, he's breaking the general rule, that remakes are
a bad idea, as well as the special, supplemental rule that
Hollywood remakes of French classics are a very bad idea.
Yet Mr. Rock's translation of Mr. Rohmer's picture into an American
idiom is so different from the original that it takes on an
independent existence. We never feel as if he is trying and failing
to make a French film.
The Rohmer mise-en-scene -- which consists of a young
married man's shilly-shallying about having an affair with an
exotic female while giving vent to voiceover musings on love,
marriage and fidelity -- is in some ways surprisingly well suited
to Mr. Rock, since the voiceovers provide him with an opportunity
to work in bits of his stand-up routine, which is often very funny.
And then there's the exotic female. Kerry Washington as the
beautiful but vulnerable Nikki Tru, who tempts Mr. Rock's Richard
Cooper, is a worthy successor to Mr Rohmer's Chloe, played by that
French-Algerian icon of the 1960s, Zouzou. Both women are, as they
have to be, quite stunningly sexy.
All that is the good news. The bad news is that there is another
and unexpected sort of artificiality built-in to I Think I Love
My Wife. For Richard, a high-flying Wall Street banker, can't
get his story straight. In his first voiceover he tells us that, in
spite of his good job, his beautiful wife Brenda (Gina Torres) and
two perfect children, "I'm bored out of my f****** mind." Fair
enough. Mr. Rohmer's hero, Frederic (Bernard Verley), wouldn't have
put it quite that way, but he probably felt something similar. But
then it also transpires that Richard and Brenda are no longer
having sexual relations for reasons the movie doesn't care to probe
too deeply. She just doesn't want to.
However disagreeable such a state of affairs may be in other
ways, it's not boring. And whatever else may not survive of Mr.
Rohmer's original in its American adaptation, one thing that does
is the need for its hero to be an Everyman. In other words, his
doubts and temptations must appear familiar to every married man.
That doesn't happen when the married man in question is the victim
of some vague marital pathology that leaves him sexually frustrated
and not just wistfully wondering, like Frederic, what he might have
missed. I wonder why Chris Rock made such a mistake? He seems to
have felt that his hero would not be likable or sympathetic enough
if he were brought to the point of committing adultery by nothing
more than boredom, curiosity, and a fantastically seductive
temptress.
Could this have anything to do with the film's racial sub-text?
Early on, there's a joke about Richard's knowing all the other
black employees of his Wall Street firm -- who turn out to be two
in number, a cleaning woman and a janitor. One of the best jokes
comes when Richard finds himself in an elevator with a number of
the firm's white employees and a black bicycle messenger who is
chanting along with his iPod to an obscene rap lyric that begins,
"F*** the cracker!" Richard tries to hide at the back of the
elevator. Later, the scene is repeated but with a white bicycle
messenger chanting the same lyric -- and Richard looking as bemused
by it as everybody else in the elevator.
Race is not just a joke. When Nikki first turns up, he tells her
that both his children are by the same mother and that he doesn't
have any "side kids," then ironically apologizes for being so
"white." Oddly, however, Nikki seems to think he's too
black, and that she will further her cause, when she makes
up her mind to seduce him, by getting him to listen to music by the
white band, the Foo Fighters, rather than the black artists he
usually favors. Then there's that coarse Viagra joke, and the
libidinous character of George (Steve Buscemi), his colleague at
the bank who is routinely unfaithful to his wife but sees no
problem about it because his emotions are not engaged.
All this suggests to me that part of Mr. Rock's purpose in
adding sexual dysfunction to Mr Rohmer's mix is the debunking of
stereotypes about black sexuality. It seems a pity to me that he
should have felt it necessary to do that. By making Richard into
such an unnaturally restrained and even uxorious husband, he also
pushes him to the borders of unbelievability, introducing a note of
incoherence into what might otherwise have been a funny but at the
same time serious meditation on love and marriage. Even as it is,
you can see in this movie the germ of one that, although it is
unimaginable as coming from its ultimate progenitor, the great Eric
Rohmer, would not disgrace him either.
topics:
Hollywood