By R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. on 3.29.07 @ 12:07AM
The Chicago proceedings against the learned Conrad Black have become a snooze.
WASHINGTONâ€"The news from the Conrad Black trial in
Chicago is a surprise. The vulpine British press is returning home.
Members of the jury have been observed deep in sleep. The circus
that was recently predicted by the New York Times has
turned into a thunderous bore.
Conrad Black is the Canadian "press baron" who over three
decades created one of the great newspaper conglomerates in the
world. At its height, at the beginning of this century, it was the
second or third largest chain of English-speaking newspapers in the
world. Including the Telegraph papers of London, the
Jerusalem Post, and Canada's National Post
(founded in 1998 by Black), Black could lay claim to being the
owner of the most high quality string of newspapers in the world.
Then disaster struck, or was it simply jealousy?
At the New York investment firm of Tweedy Browne, holder of 13
million shares of Black's publicly held company, Hollinger, there
arose in late 2001 a restive spirit supposedly concerned about
"management fees" paid by Hollinger to a private company,
Ravelston, which was controlled by Black. Black and his associates
got the money. Tweedy Browne's "restive spirit" agitated for an
investigation, and the Hollinger board of directors tapped Richard
Breeden, once chairman of the SEC, to oversee it. Breeden had
become a corporate reformer, and the report he eventually deposited
has been described by Holman W. Jenkins, Jr. of the Wall Street
Journal as "an inflammatory report." It accused Black and his
lieutenants or "corporate kleptocracy."
That brought in the feds. Black and several associates were
indicted on such charges as racketeering, obstruction of justice,
money laundering and mail fraud. Facing some one hundred years in
prison Black chose to fight. A partner of his, David Radler, copped
a plea. Black was forced out of Hollinger and Hollinger's stock
plummeted. Possibly the "restive spirit" at Tweedy Browne has
subsided. Since Black has been out Hollinger's shareholders have
lost a bundle, though lawyers all around have rung up over $60
million in fees. There had to be a better way to address this
question of "management fees."
Black did not begin his career as a journalist. He was a
businessman. Yet the company he built, the newspapers he published,
and the journalists he encouraged mark him off as one of the finest
newspapermen of modern times. He himself is a stupendously
civilized man, widely learned and the author of two splendid
biographies, one of Franklin Roosevelt, the other (to be published
this spring) of Richard Nixon. When he was on top at Hollinger,
journalism in the English-speaking world was vastly more
interesting than it is today. I have known him for two decades and
admired his works. I have also had my run-ins with him. A few years
back I refused a deal he offered me. Boy was he mad. I was too. But
that is water under the bridge. Black is a major force for good in
the publishing world, and all who favor a free and intelligent
press should hope that he will be back.
From Chicago it sounds as though he might be back. One of
Canada's most distinguished journalists writes from the courtroom
after observing two weeks of the trial, "Conrad Black will be found
not guilty." Peter Worthington is a bit irked, expressing his view
in the Toronto Sun that American prosecutors have been
dismissive of Canada, which they have "depicted as Albania." But it
is the case that the prosecutors have made that provokes
Worthington's judgment that Black will be acquitted. As he sees it,
the charges against Black and his co-defendants "are not only
unwarranted but wrong." After two weeks "there has been no evidence
produced that clearly indicates a crime committed." Better yet, the
courtroom proceedings have become "booooring."
So the hacks in the press are growing tired of the trial. The
drama of bringing a grand figure down is not developing. Black has
been a gentleman through the entire proceedings, though he faces
months more. His stance has been valiant. He did not cop a plea. He
has trusted in the justice of an American court. He remains a
friend of America. If Worthington is right, Black may yet mount one
of the great comebacks in modern journalistic history.
topics:
Business, Law