The American Spectator

Reader Mail

(Page 5 of 16)

But the point is, you're not going to get abortion thrown back to the states and then the slow crawl to extinction -- in large part -- unless you've got someone who will make sure their Supreme Court appointment is for real.

You should be for Rudy, because he'll win. He won't take away our guns; if his word means anything, and I believe it does, he'll appoint originalists to the bench; he'll advocate and fight for supply-side tax reform; and he'll attack Islamic fascism like there's no tomorrow.

p>You've got a better candidate? Bring him to the table, please. br> -- Brent Vondera /p> p> Daniel Allott communicates excellent points in this article. However, while the argument that pro-life conservatives will not support Rudy might be true now, if Rudy wins the nomination, that should change. I've always been unconvinced by just such single-issue arguments and believe that voters generally find themselves holding their noses and supporting the candidate that they least object to on principled grounds. I believe that those who do not vote because of such single-issue principles should move elsewhere to find their utopia. br> -- J. W. Eilert, Jr. br> Wooster, Ohio /p> p> HIT MITT br> Re: Philip Klein's When Romney Attacks

topics:
Taxes, Education, Entitlements, Islam, Abortion, Environment, Global Warming, Constitution, Law, Supreme Court, Iraq, Fascism, Conservatism, Immigration