By Larry Thornberry on 2.1.07 @ 12:06AM
John Mortimer's priceless creation now confronts the War on Terror.
Rumpole and the Reign of Terror
By John Mortimer
(Viking, 184 pages, $23.95)
English writer and former barrister John Mortimer has
accomplished a couple of very counterintuitive things along the way
of creating one of the most delightful characters in all of English
literature.
Mortimer not only has given the world an entertaining lawyer we
can all love, albeit a literary one, but he's also demonstrated
that occasionally a lifetime man of the political and cultural left
(a long lifetime in Mortimer's case; he left 80 in the rearview
mirror a few years back) can be both funny and thoughtful about the
things that matter most.
American television viewers owe Mortimer a debt of thanks for
Horace Rumpole, the short, stout, claret-soaked and poetry-quoting
barrister best known to Americans as "Rumpole of the Bailey," from
the television series of that name broadcast on PBS periodically
from 1978 to 1990. Rumpole was played by the incomparable Leo
McKern, who was put on this earth by God specifically to bring this
character to life. Sadly for us left behind, McKern has gone on to
his reward, which, as I believe God to be fair, should be
considerable. But there will be no new Rumpole on TV, the thought
of anyone other than McKern playing Rumpole being as
incomprehensible and unlikely as an Episcopal bishop saying
something sensible.
But Mortimer is still with us and with it. So there can be more
Rumpole on the page. Readers have enjoyed following the amusing
exploits of Rumpole through a dozen short story collections,
beginning with 1978's Rumpole of the Bailey, and now, with
the publication of Rumpole and the Reign of Terror, three
short novels. Readers looking for thoughtful laughs from their
fiction could do worse than beginning with Rumpole of the
Bailey and chuckling their way through the entire collection.
Hard to imagine where to get more laughs per mile.
The humor comes from the way Rumpole, Mortimer's alter ego,
pierces the pomposity and deflates the worst impulses of judges and
prosecutors (the two classes often being hard to distinguish in
Rumpole stories -- both strain the quality of mercy to
within an inch of its life) by his brash and penetrating
questioning and courtroom dramatics. No one deals with the
insolence of office in a more delightful way than our Horace.
Many assume Rumpole to be a liberal, because he always appears
for the defense, because he often has little patience with figures
of authority, and because he was created by lifetime Labour
partisan Mortimer, who has had some pretty snarky things to say
about Margaret Thatcher. But this is error and slander. Rumpole is
not an apologist for crime, but a stout defender of the presumption
of innocence (as all good conservatives should be). He's not an
enemy of authority, but of its abuse, always too common in Old
Blighty and just about everywhere else.
And for a lifetime lefty, Mortimer has more than his share of
lucid moments. Rumpole doesn't just beat up judges, prosecutors,
politicians, and clergymen, whom he often portrays as
self-important humbugs with the souls of hangmen, but he also has a
good deal of fun at the expense of black-belt feminists, food nuts,
anti-smoking Nazis, animal rights activists, psychobabblers, PC
enforcers, enviro-nutters, and other wholly-owned subsidiaries of
the cultural left.
REIGN OF TERROR BEGINS, as many Rumpole stories do, with
our Horace down the Old Bailey (London's central criminal court)
defending a member of the Timson clan -- an extended family of
South London villains Rumpole has devoted much of his career to
keeping out of the nick -- accused of the kind of garden variety
crime that keeps bread on the Timson table. Rumpole leaves with a W
in the current case, and with a new kind of client in a wholly new
kind of predicament. Dr. Mahmood Khan, a Pakistani doctor married
to Tiffany Timson, is well-liked and more English than the English.
He finds himself charged with something to do with terrorism,
though it's hard to tell what because the authorities won't tell
Mahmood or Rumpole what Mahmood is supposed to have done and what
the evidence is against him.
The point of this novel, the most political and most topical of
the Rumpole stories, is to give Mortimer some space to vent on the
steps New Labour has taken to protect the UK from terrorists, steps
Mortimer feels tread unnecessarily on the rights English citizens
have traditionally enjoyed. In previous stories Mortimer has given
us gentle wit and satire, with Horace playing off against an
ensemble cast of slightly off-plumb judges, prosecutors, and his
colleagues in chambers at 4 Equity Court. (And of course Horace's
formidable and worthy wife, Hilda, known to Rumpole as "She Who
Must Be Obeyed.") These judicial short-rounds (an artilleryman's
term -- think about it) are present in Reign of Terror,
and amuse us as always. But they share a stage with some real names
and real offices and real contemporary issues.
Though I was doubtful before I opened Reign, I found
that Mortimer does indeed manage to pull off this tricky mix of the
serious and the whimsical. Rumpole never betrays his fierce
devotion to the defense of his client, but it's made clear that
both Horace and his creator take the threat of terrorism seriously,
more seriously than many on the left. Regular TAS readers
might draw the line at a different place than Mortimer on this one,
but it will be clear after this literary exercise that Mortimer has
informed his emotion with some serious thought.
Regular Rumpole readers are familiar with Mortimer's habit of
providing us with happy endings. Don't look for any changes here.
I'll leave it up to those whom I've convinced to read the book to
see how Horace moves Dr. Mahmood from a kangaroo court proceeding
to a real trial. Suffice it to say that Mortimer is not above using
some standard Rumpole trickery, even in a case involving issues of
life and death.
topics:
Television, Satire, Law, Pakistan