The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
The Public Policy
Print Email
Text Size

The Public Policy

Better Late Than Never

On closer inspection, the Bush Health Insurance tax reform proposal is looking better and better.

(Page 2 of 3)

study by researchers at the Urban Institute and Johns Hopkins University estimated that 20 percent of the uninsured could afford coverage, which would mean that over 9 million people would have a bigger incentive to purchase health insurance should the Bush plan become law. Also, as noted above, the Treasury Department estimates assume that people will not change their behavior in the face of new incentives. If the plan causes people to purchase less health insurance and thus drives down the cost, then it will likely help millions more of those uninsured due to low income. p> Fracturing of the risk pool and a decline in employer-based coverage: Over at Spot On, Matthew Holt summarizes this criticism nicely: br> /p>
…in California, a $7,500 deduction for a young individual exceeds their cost for a bare-bones insurance plan by a factor of five. In that case, you can expect young employees to go their employees and demand a few thousand dollars more in cash and then opt out of the health insurance benefit, and take the full tax deduction. What happens next? Well the employer’s risk pool fractures, leaving only those employees whose insurance costs much more than the average looking to the employer for coverage. The likely result is that those employers offering insurance on the margin will give all their employees cash, and then tell them to go fend for themselves in the individual market. This won’t affect members of Congress, high-priced lawyers and investment bankers, but it will be a big deal for those employees who were getting decent benefits at work but now forced to go cap in hand to the underwritten individual market — a market place where pooling risk is a dirty word.
br> On the other hand, employment-based coverage is already declining because it is too costly. And one reason it is too costly is that younger, healthier employees are turning down the health insurance offered by their employers. As the Cato Institute’s Michael Cannon put it, “healthy people realize they’re being ripped off and they want out.” Should the President’s plan result in lower costs for health insurance, employers would be more able to offer it and younger, healthier employees would be more likely to purchase it, leading to some preservation of the risk pool. p> The President’s Plan Is Behind the Times: Jonathan Cohn ends his reaction
Page:   12 3  

topics:
Taxes, Health Care, Business, Law

About the Author

David Hogberg is a senior fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research. Follow him on Twitter.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (1) |

louis vuitton | 4.27.10 @ 1:12AM

"American" and "Danish" are not races, but nationalities. Perhaps there needs to be yet another law canada gooseAfter the immigration bill failed in the U.S. Senate, the postmortems deplored the new power of bloggers and the Internet.

Related Articles

More Articles by David Hogberg

More Articles From The Public Policy

http://spectator.org/archives/2007/01/29/better-late-than-never

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT