(Page 2 of 12)
p> Enjoyed reading your most recent column regarding the Sandy Berger National Archives Caper. During his book signing tour several months ago, I brought up this subject with former Clinton advisor Dick Morris and got his take on this caper. He stated quite firmly that "Hillary's fingerprints were all over this." I'm surprised that nobody is bringing up the proposition that Sandy Berger was acting under the direction of a higher up with his reward being a position in the upcoming probable Clinton administration. Am I missing something, or should we be ready to point the finger at somebody bigger than Mr. Berger behind this breach of national security? br> -- Dan Trimmer br> Enterprise, Florida /p> p> The bad thing is that no matter what crimes the Clintons and their ilk do the MSM finds a way to make it into nothing. I still do not understand why the "JUSTICE" Department did not throw the book at Berger. Just think if the Queen of Slime becomes President, Berger can become National Security Adviser again, since his slap on the wrist was only a three-year ban on his viewing secret items. It will end just in time for a Democrat President. br> -- Elaine Kyle /p>Yeah, yeah, yeah -- the leftists won't do anything to shine the light of truth on Sandy Berger's treason. So what else is new?
The question you should be asking is why the hell the Bush Justice Department didn't even bother to throw his treasonous rear in prison for 20 years, instead of letting him off with a slap on the wrist?
p>And when he's Hillary Clinton's National Security Adviser, it's a pretty sure bet his treason will be buried even deeper. br> -- Jim Switz br> Port Townsend, Washington