(Page 6 of 12)
Edda Gahm br> Diamond Bar, California /p>And the hits -- as in: the physical, societal and other consequences we're all going to suffer because of the Republicans getting themselves tossed out of Congress' majority -- just keep rolling in!
What is it about Pelosi and the Democrats and liberals that causes them to possess the misconception that they must take something, broken or not, and tinker with us, usually making it even worse? What fracture compels them to believe that bureaucracy and others actually know what's best for us? Why do they keep wanting to stick their fingers in private citizens' lives? Is this all payback to the deep pockets and voting blocks that got them elected? But specifically on healthcare, have they experienced the decision-by-faceless-health-care-providers? If so, why the Dems' and liberals' amnesia?
p>Whatever the reason(s), they'd be wise to stop. Now, while they still have their short-term majority. But even if they do, this whole notion of Pelosi's attempt to reprise Hillary R. Clinton's damage to the supply and pricing of pharmaceuticals -- and add further agita to Americans' -- should be sufficient impetus for every conservative and Republican to begin today what's needed to displace the new Congressional majority. br> -- C. Kenna Amos br> Princeton, West Virginia /p> p> NO CLASS br> Re: Reader Mail's (including Carla Ward's letter in) Boorish Pride :
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.