The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Talking Words

The art of American accents. Also: Saigon Democrats. Vanishing Episcopalians — questions for Bishop Schori. Gobbling up Nancy. Plus much more.

(Page 2 of 16)

Kate Shaw br> Toronto, Ontario /p>

Mr. Henry’s article hit the spot, or as Diane Smith says, “Spot on.” We Texans are not to be lonely in the accent game Mr. Henry speaks of. Having grown up in Lyndon Johnson’s Hometown of Johnson City, Texas, we spoke both cowboy and German. Around the Texas hill country there are many ranchers whose families migrated (legally) over a hundred years ago. Their accent depends on the location the grandparents came from. I discovered this after living in Germany for four years and working hard to learn the language. The highest compliment ever paid me was when my teacher told me she was sorry but that I had developed a Bavarian accent. I asked her why that was a problem and she answered, “Well, that is Southern accent and when you travel up north they won’t understand you.” I told her I had the same problem back home in the United States.

The one thing I know is that you and know two Texans anywhere you travel in the world. They are the first to find and greet each other with one particular phrase…”How much rain did ya get!” This happened to me in Germany, Washington, D.C., Kansas, Kentucky, and Arizona…all places we were stationed. Why receiving rain in another place was important to either Texan always made me laugh. Then I reasoned that rain and receiving it is always a part of the Texas mentality for here it is always a feast of rain or a famine/drought.

p>Happy Thanksgiving…. br> — Beverly Gunn br> East Texas Rancher /p>

Another entertaining article from Mr. Henry; one of my interests is in regional accents and how it shapes opinions of others.

One of the most fascinating political ramifications of accents was from a PBS or Discovery Channel special I’d seen many moons ago. It focused on how the connotations of accents change over the years. For example, in the 1960’s, an upper-crusty New England accent (imagine JFK saying “Harvard Yard”) was supposedly a net positive to a presidential candidate, while a more “common man” accent like LBJ’s Texas twang was a net negative.

Over time, the JFK accent has changed so that it’s now perceived as a negative — certainly John Kerry always seemed to me to be “talking to the help” when on the stump. By contrast, a Southern accent is more comfortable and down-home, which gives candidates like Dubya — and Bill Clinton! — an edge with the (IMO) most critical swing voters. By that I don’t mean those who vacillate between parties — I mean the 10% of the electorate which is ideologically innocent, only looking at the candidates a week or two before Nov. 7, and thinks, “Hmm, who looks and sounds most trustworthy?”

I do have to take two minor issues with Mr. Henry’s close:

“My son Bud has noticed that his classmates’ accents are less pronounced than their parents’. Absent some temporary fad, like slurry or Valley Girl, that is the established trend.”

Page:   12 3 4   Last ›

topics:
Bill Clinton, Television, Religion, Catholicism, Abortion, Environment, Law, Military, Iraq, NATO, Africa, Oil

Letter to the Editor

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2006/11/27/talking-words

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

Damage Control for Dummies

Matt Purple | 5.22.13

Obama’s Assault on the First Amendment

George Neumayr | 5.22.13

Undoing the Brainwashing

Thomas Sowell | 5.22.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Wimps Versus Barbarians

Thomas Sowell | 5.21.13

ADVERTISEMENT