By Paul Beston on 11.27.06 @ 12:08AM
Few taboos left to break.
The Michael Richards mess -- a sitcom star, nearly a decade past
notoriety, talking trash in a Los Angeles comedy club -- seemed
like a one day story. But as always with such things, it is the
reaction to the event that is of interest.
As far as Richards is concerned, he seems determined to outdo
the ugliness of his rant on November 17th with the servility of his
multiple acts of contrition. His publicist, casting a wide net for
overstatement, says that his client has opened a "terrible racial
wound in our nation," and Richards has dutifully gone groveling to
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. "We might turn this minus into a
plus," Jackson says, and he doesn't need to say for whom. As
Star Parker points out, Richards' turning to
Jackson and Sharpton as the representatives of the black community
is condescending in the extreme. Meanwhile, the men in the audience
who were the targets of Richards' insults have retained legal
representation to seek damages.
Those who genuinely object to what Richards said are not
contradicting themselves if they also abhor how the victim
mentality and its representatives swoop down instantly, like
buzzards picking the carrion apart before the blood has dried.
It has been pointed out that Richards is apologizing only
because the incident was captured on tape. If it were not for the
You-Tubing of America, the pressure on him to apologize would be
infinitely less. It was only when millions of people were able to
view the incident that some public statement became necessary.
Some cite this as proof of Richards' insincerity, but in truth
the video audience is the only one worth apologizing to. The live
audience is fair game, since going to a comedy club is something
like sitting ringside at a prizefight: you might get sprayed by
some nasty stuff.
Anyone familiar with comedy clubs knows that the style of
performance is often quite abusive. It seems to me that people who
attend such venues expect this kind of material and this kind of
treatment -- as long as it is at the expense of others, not
themselves. It's the same philosophy that feeds the success of
radio shock jocks like Howard Stern: the comedian as bully, with an
audience watching or listening in adoration as long as none of the
abuse comes their way.
At the Laugh Factory, a few black audience members heckled
Richards for not being funny; he responded with references to
lynching and multiple repetitions of the word "nigger." One of the
men then responded, "That was uncalled for!" Indeed it was, and
Richards' response was way out of proportion, but the audience
members had initiated the exchange. They liked dishing it out, but
didn't care for taking it.
None of this exonerates Richards -- he said what he said, and
people are free to draw their own conclusions about him. Jerry
Seinfeld, who acted as a good soldier (as well as a careful
businessman) in getting his friend Richards a prime apology slot on
David Letterman's show, spoke about how sickened he was by
Richards' remarks. You want to say, "But Jerry, these people were
in a nightclub. Who were they expecting, Jimmy
Stewart?"
Although his outburst appeared spontaneous, Richards seemed to
be aiming for Lenny Bruce territory -- trying to shock people by
breaking a taboo, followed by a lecture on how it's only a word
(Richards said something to this effect on the tape). I think
taboos are vastly underrated myself, but people who go to comedy
clubs tend to feel differently. No one is forcing them to choose
foul-mouthed comics for their evening entertainment.
Those black Americans who have resurrected the use of the most
notorious racial epithet as an ironic statement of rebellion or
racial pride or God knows what else are reaping the whirlwind by
doing so. Gangsta rappers and their ilk have made the word more
casual and less taboo, while also insisting that only they have the
right to wield it. Outbursts like Richards' are inevitable in a
climate that on one hand is overrun with political correctness and
on the other mocks the very idea that there is such a thing as bad
taste.
topics:
Business