By Peter Suderman on 11.17.06 @ 12:07AM
Fast Food Nation has been deep-fried by some super-sized meatheads.
Fast Food Nation kicks off with a suit-clad fast food
chain boss telling one of his executives to investigate a meat
packing plant rumored to be allowing fecal matter to infect the
beef. But the only thing that's contaminated here is director
Richard Linklater's meandering, unfocused movie, which has an
unmistakable whiff of Causeitis -- a compulsive inability to avoid
taking up any of the many issues in the lefty activist canon.
As he did in movies like Dazed and Confused and
Waking Life, Linklater gives us another sprawling
talkfest. But instead of his usual bent toward abstract
philosophical pondering, Fast Food Nation is a bubbling
vat of unhinged lefty political rambling -- a manic run through the
liberal cause midway, dead set on playing every game and taking aim
at every target.
Linklater's movie is primarily about trying to get us to think
that fast food is seriously icky stuff. But it's also about (just
to name several that spring to mind): illegal immigration, animal
rights, the PATRIOT act, hourly wage work, biotech foods,
industrial farming, sexual exploitation, employee abuse, rightwing
collusion between business and government, Halliburton, eminent
domain abuse, globalization, workplace safety, exercising one's
passion for environmental activism, corporate financial scandal,
and, erm, the spread of home-brew meth labs. It's a 2000 calorie
serving of blindly flailing anti-corporate diatribes complete with
all the side dish rants anyone could ever want.
As one might expect from such an unruly mess of topics, the
movie is spectacularly unfocused. Plotlines appear and disappear
like limited time only menu items. At first, the protagonist seems
to be the aforementioned executive, Don Anderson (Greg Kinnear, who
spends most of the movie moping glumly). He heads out to Wyoming to
investigate the safety practices of the suspect plant. But the
story also follows a band of illegal immigrants as they cross the
border and secure jobs, most of which are at the plant in question.
As the film moves forward, other storylines fade in and out,
leaving the film with little solid narrative ground.
Linklater presents Wyoming as a sort of Crunchy Con hell: the land owners are under
threat; giant highways packed with SUVs cut through the landscape;
the roadsides are mined with chains like Wal-Marts and McDonald's;
the food is all greasy and pre-processed; and the system is
barricaded and fortified to prevent anything from changing it. If
there is a single unifying theme in the movie, it's an
unadulterated disgust with the spread of big corporations.
The film tries to make several significant points with a series
of star cameos. Kris Kristofferson shows up as a besieged landowner
who complains about the low quality standards meat packing plants
use to ratchet up their profits. Ethan Hawke swaggers in as a
former hippie protester reminiscing about his college glory days of
sit-ins and activism.
But the cameo that makes the biggest impression is Bruce Willis'
turn as a brutish, misogynist regional business manager. In his
single scene, Willis chows down beef, makes lewd comments about
women, and espouses a libertarian-style ideology of buyer-beware
profit maximization. "Want to be safe? Perfectly safe?" he grunts,
"Well that's not gonna happen. Forty thousand people die in auto
accidents every year. Does that mean Detroit should stop making
cars?" Willis' one-note character is portrayed as pure, snarling
evil, a walking, talking symbol of all that the film wants us to
see as wrong with free-market capitalism. The problem, though, is
that, despite the manner in which Willis' character is played,
there's a certain truth to his statements. One should avoid
unnecessary dangers, but some level of risk is inherent in every
business.
If Willis provides the movie's most sneering scene, several
late-film moments with a band of young environmental activists
provide the most witless. Partially inspired by Ethan Hawke's
character, these youngsters sit around blubbering out a slew of
leftwing talking points -- everything from corporate campaign
donations to fawning over Greenpeace -- and eventually tromp off on
a foolhardy mission to "rescue" some cattle from their pen. They
cut the fence, but the cows won't leave, giving them an opportunity
to brood over whether the cows were "too stupid" to take an
opportunity for "freedom." "Who knows. Maybe it's easier in there,"
one kid says, as if trying to cattle-prod the audience into
recognizing that those stupid cows are really, like, a metaphor for
the American people, man.
Still, for all its extraneous commentary, the movie is mostly
designed to sell audiences on the notion that fast food isn't just
unhealthy, but downright disgusting. Thus, every scene with food is
shot in as unappetizing a manner as possible, and it makes sure to
cash in on every sort of kitchen and food-prep related gross out.
Surly, burger-flipping teenage cooks spit in sandwiches and drop
burger patties on the floor; the meat packing plant, with its
sterile color scheme, comes off like an all-white industrial hell.
In the film's final moments, we head out onto the killing floor, a
scene that plays like a ghoulish scare-sequence from a horror film
-- all spooky music over surreal visions of blood and guts. The
idea isn't just to convince audiences that fast food can be
unhealthy, but that it's deeply grotesque and even frightening.
Never mind that eating beef, from any source, must necessarily
involve killing, and that, yes, it can be a somewhat bloody
process. The movie conflates one's distaste for watching
slaughterhouse procedure with revulsion for the finished meal.
In the end, few of the movie's points register, for Linklater is
far more concerned with quantity than quality. It's the fast-food
approach to politically aware cinema, filmmaking that fills one up
on empty feeling but provides little in the way of substance.
topics:
Business, Environment, Books, Movies, Immigration