The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Political Hay
Print Email
Text Size

Political Hay

Constitutional Mulligan

The U.S. Constitution is the nation's best defense against liberalism, so it isn't surprising that one law professor wants to scrap it.

(Page 2 of 2)

America was slow to adopt welfare programs, social security, unemployment insurance, and government-supported health care, while Europe adopted these policies rapidly. We have kept our tax rate lower than it is in most of Europe. The central difference is not that Europeans are either smarter or dumber than we, but that a parliamentary system permits temporary popular majorities to make bold changes rather quickly, whereas a presidential system with a powerful, independent, and internally divided Congress requires that big changes undergo lengthy debates and substantive accommodations.
br> Eventually, America did adopt many welfare programs (mainly during two periods in our history when Democrats held huge majorities that enabled the American government, in Wilson's words, to "act like a parliamentary system"), but America has not degenerated into a full-fledged European welfare state largely because of the way our Constitution was written.

This may be bad news for progressives, but even those of them who are eager to tear up the U.S. Constitution and start all over should consider that a parliamentary system cuts both ways. Liberals may have been frustrated by their inability to achieve universal healthcare during the Clinton years, but if America were a parliamentary system, they would have woken up to the reality of a Prime Minister Gingrich the morning after the 1994 elections. Had it not been for the "cumbersome legislative process," Democrats would have found it much more difficult -- if not impossible -- to stop Social Security privatization last year.

Obviously, it still makes a difference what party is in power. Should Democrats emerge victorious next month, they will likely investigate President Bush aggressively and block attempts to make his tax cuts permanent. But Republicans will still have an arsenal of tools at their disposal to stymie the Democrats. And for that, we have the founders to thank.

Page:   12

topics:
Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Social Security, Environment, Constitution, Law, Alaska

About the Author

Philip Klein is The American Spectator's Washington correspondent. You can follow him on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/Philipaklein

Letter to the Editor View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

louis vuitton| 4.27.10 @ 1:09AM

honor's decline had other far-reaching effects. The new supremacy of the individual psyche helped create the inward-looking antihero, with all but 60 days suspended,canada gooseAfter the immigration bill failed in the U.S. Senate, the postmortems deplored the new power of bloggers and the Internet.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by Philip Klein

More Articles From Political Hay

http://spectator.org/archives/2006/10/20/constitutional-mulligan

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Greg Sowards Battles Queen RINO

Jeffrey Lord | 5.24.12

We Have To Do Something

Ben Stein | 5.24.12

The Problem With High-Mileage Cars

Eric Peters | 5.24.12

Big Mack Attack

Larry Thornberry | 5.24.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT