(Page 3 of 11)
If Foley were a Democrat, he would not have resigned.
p>If Foley were a Democrat, he would have been re-elected. br> -- Dan Martin br> Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania /p> p> Is this post real? Did Ben Stein really write: "an entire party, the Democrats, whose primary constituency, besides the teachers' unions, is homosexual men and lesbian women. I hope it won't come as a surprise to anyone that a big part of male homosexual behavior is interest in young boys." I am not homosexual, and I may sometimes have a similar thought cross my mind, but I cannot believe a known personality put this thought into print. br> -- Chris Wyser-Pratte br> New York, New York /p> p> I enjoyed Mr. Stein's article very much, but unfortunately, I think this issue is seen in reverse terms. It is a matter of group identification. Democrats as a group, ostensibly support homosexuality and promiscuity without reservation, and Republicans are seen to tend otherwise. Despite all obvious violations done to women and homosexuals by individual Democrats (you left out the worst criminal violator of all time -- Mr. Kennedy), their party pays lip service to this view. Thus Mr. Foley's destruction. br> -- John Doherty br> San Francisco, California
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.