The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Thank You, Mr. Secretary

Is Rummy the best ever? Also: Going nuclear? Or going global warm? Plus: Still a long time until November. Samuel Adams. And much more.

(Page 3 of 15)

Jimmy Carter was a nuclear engineer? Ha. Do some research! Jimmy Carter TOOK A CLASS in nuclear physics while in the navy. He is NOT a nuclear engineer.

On the amount of carbon dioxide released by burning coal -- (several tons of CO2 per ton of carbon in coal) this is meaningless gibberish. As a mining engineer, I have heard a lifetime of silly comments by EXPERTS such as Tucker, who grab whatever "facts" sound good to them at the time. Yes, several tons of CO2 COULD be created ...in a lab, theoretically...per ton of carbon...

C'mon.

I was considering subscribing to The Spectator, as I have enjoyed it in the past, but you need to screen your contributors. This piece could have been written by a high school kid doing a "science" report.

p>I have no beef against nuclear energy, but any knowledgeable person will laugh out loud when reading Tucker's article. There were several more thigh-slappers I won't even comment on. Send Tucker over to write for The Nation . br> -- John Decker br> Kenai, Alaska /p>

Once again, The Spectator proves that it is a truly liberal publication; it prints opinions that are not necessarily accepted by its constituents.

Some of Mr. Tucker's points are quite practical. In a country that faces energy shortages, an astronomical debt, and an ongoing war, there is only so much tree hugging that we can do.

p>I disagree with Mr. Tucker's premises: that global warming is a fact and that human activity causes it. The industrial revolution, which has been in process for over 2 centuries, would have produced a temperature spike long ago, if the climate were not self regulating, as I suspect. We are simply at the peak of a cyclical warm period that Al Gore, inventor of the Internet, described in "Earth in the Balance." Those old enough to remember the 1960s, will recall scientists predicting a new Ice Age! The reason that a carbon dioxide consuming shade tree is better than a tarp is that the tree is converting the sun light into cellulose, not just blocking it. br> --
Page:   1 23 4 5   Last ›

topics:
Foreign Policy, Trade, Business, Religion, Islam, Abortion, Environment, Global Warming, Books, Law, Military, Iraq, Pakistan, Africa, Socialism, Energy, Alaska, Oil

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2006/09/06/thank-you-mr-secretary
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT