A small town of less than 2,000 households, Hurricane, West Virginia, is betting its future on its location amidst “Advantage Alley,” a five-county partnership promoting economic development along the state’s Interstate 64 corridor.
Yet, ironically, the town suffers from a major disadvantage. Hurricane, it turns out, is caught the eye of a storm now threatening America’s health industry: over-zealous trial lawyers who, in this instance, have descended upon the community’s sole hospital and buried it underneath an avalanche of lawsuits, thus compelling the citizens of Hurricane and tens of thousands of others West Virginians to look elsewhere for reliable medical care.
At issue is the future of Putnam General Hospital in Putnam County, West Virginia. More than 100 lawsuits have been filed against Putnam General’s parent company, Hospital Corporation of America, seeking billions in damages for alleged medical malpractice. Specifically, the suits claim wrongdoing on the part of Dr. John Anderson King, an orthopedic surgeon who was on staff at Putnam General for eight months between 2002 and 2003, before the hospital suspended his privileges.
HCA’s response to this litigious piling-on? It planned to shut down the hospital, which would have occurred at August’s end had not a nearby medical center intervened. However, with the new management running the hospital on only an interim basis, Putnam General’s future remains very much in doubt. If the past is any indication, the rural community is in deep trouble. Twenty-five years ago, it took county officials more than five years to convince the West Virginia Health Care Authority to approve construction of a new hospital.
This one county’s plight raises at least two important questions about the future of America’s health industry, the first being the reliability of both doctors and medical information in this Information Age. The fact is Dr. King was licensed to practice in West Virginia and nine other states. HCA contends that its background check found nothing troublesome regarding the doctor. However, as the Wall Street Journal has reported, medical data bases contained faulty or incomplete information. So while trial lawyers look for a big payday (trial lawyers typically walk away with at least one-third of an award), what goes overlooked is the veracity of government watchdogs, who theoretically should be safeguarding our hospitals just as they keep a watchful eye on our airports and airwaves.
Which leads to the second question: what’s motivating the trial lawyers? It is really easing others’ suffering, or is it just another case of fattening one’s own wallet?
That so-called “jackpot justice” is a cash cow on today’s society is hardly a moot point. One study has found that America’s trial lawyers generate about $46 billion annually, with revenue growing more than 11% a year — nearly triple the rate of growth in the nation’s domestic product. A recent report by the Manhattan Institute finds that medical malpractice liability now accounts for one-tenth of America’s “tort tax,” which each year costs a family of four more than $3,300.
And if you doubt that dollar signs weigh as heavily as justice’s scales, consider this amusing sideshow that’s spawned from Putnam County’s woes. As anyone who watches late-night television knows, trial attorneys advertise to generate business. And, in the case of Putnam General, they do their best to try their cases in the court of public opinion.
But, apparently, not all trial lawyers get along.
A Charleston attorney has filed suit against 25 of his former clients in the Putnam General case, claiming they owe him $76,000 for “litigation-related costs and expenses” while he represented them. A fellow local trial attorney has called the case “nuts” and “unprecedented.” It turns out that the two attorneys have gone after each other in court before, over allegation of fraud, extortion, and how to divide an $833,000 “jackpot” from a drug manufacturer.
Granted, trial lawyers aren’t the only profession to be profit-motivated. But the question is: profit to what end?
The West Virginia Record, a legal journal, summed it up neatly in a recent editorial. “Justice needs to be served,” it opined. “The problem is that lawyers want much more than that.”p>It went on: br> /p>
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?