By Patrick O'Hannigan on 8.11.06 @ 12:07AM
To the likes of Dan Rather, Fidel Castro was "Cuba's Elvis." To most everyone else, he was scum. Just ask Ms. Helena Houdova.
I have never been to Cuba. But as the world waits with varying
degrees of patience to see whether Fidel Castro has assumed room
temperature, I can't help wondering why Hollywood films about Cuba
almost inevitably portray that island nation in pre-Revolutionary
times. Think Buena Vista Social Club, The Lost
City, and the Cuban cameo in The Godfather, Part
II.
The Batista regime was corrupt and thuggish, and the American
embargo on trade with Cuba continues to give many libertarians
heartburn (particularly now that Soviet subsidies for Cuba have
dried up), but if Castro was as benevolent and misunderstood as
apologists for him are always saying, (Dan Rather called him
"Cuba's Elvis") then why does so much celluloid look longingly at
the time before Castro elbowed his way onto the geopolitical stage?
Why is (or more hopefully, was) Castro so averse to even the merest
zephyr of criticism?
Reporter Juan Manuel Cao, who works for a Spanish-language TV
station in Miami, followed Fidel Castro to a summit meeting in
Argentina. When he asked Castro why he refused to let Mrs. Hilda
Molina of Cuba visit her son and grandchildren in Argentina, Castro
screamed that the reporter was "a mercenary paid by the Bush," who
will "probably try to assassinate me with a bomb." Castro's
bodyguards put Cao in a chokehold for his impertinence. Humberto
Fontova, who wrote a book about Hollywood's favorite dictator,
filed a July 27 story on the incident for Newsmax.com, but other
media outlets let it slip down the memory hole without comment.
You can be thin-skinned even without being confronted. In
January of this year, per a wire service dispatch from (ahem)
Reuters, Castro ordered a wall built to hide an electronic ticker
in front of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Havana because that
billboard was displaying human rights messages. Heaven forbid that
ordinary Cubans be tempted to commit thought crimes by reading
eye-level quotes from the likes of Abraham Lincoln and Lech Walesa
as they strolled by, rejoicing in their literacy and universal
health care.
The truth, as Cuban-Americans and Cuban exiles have been saying
for years, is that very few people will mourn Fidel Castro's
passing. Even fellow travelers like Venezuela's Hugh Chavez will
muster only crocodile tears, if pundits like Bridget Johnson are
right. Her August 1st synopsis for National Review Online
minced no words: "As much as they've snuggled and back-patted, as
much as they act like dysfunctional father and bratty son, the
death of the linchpin of Latin American Communism will probably be
the best news Hugo Chavez has gotten since he met his useful
anti-Bush idiot dream girl, Cindy Sheehan," Johnson opined.
Still, a sizable number of the glitterati in the United States
think "anti-Castro extremism" is an additive in Miami's municipal
water supply, or a well-thumbed appendix in the neocon playbook.
You can talk ad nauseam about health care and literacy
rates if you ignore the two-tiered nature of Cuba's health care
system and the dearth of non-Communist reading material to be
literate for, and so they do.
One wishes these Castro apologists could visit Havana with
Theodore Dalrymple. Like that fair-minded doctor and City
Journal essayist, they might come to realize that Havana had
to die because its pre-Revolutionary beauty and prosperity gave the
lie to Castro's preferred narrative. Dalrymple floated this hypothesis in 2002:
Who created Havana, and where did the magnificence come
from, if before Castro there were only poverty, corruption, and
thuggery? Best to destroy the evidence, though not by the crude
Taliban method of blowing up the statues of Buddha, which is
inclined to arouse the opprobrium of the world: better to let huge
numbers of people camp out permanently in stolen property and then
let time and neglect do the rest. In a young population such as
Cuba's, with little access to information not filtered through
official channels, life among the ruins will come to seem normal
and natural. The people will soon be radically disconnected from
the past of the very walls they live among. And so the present
ruins of Havana are the material consequence of a monomaniacal
historiography put into practice.
A-list actors and directors might know a little about monomania,
don't you think? Not that they would admit to seeing it ninety
miles off the tip of Florida. For too many of them, Che Guevara's
erstwhile boss is (was?) just a charismatic revolutionary in
fatigues, and Cuba's just a country where people who are "fiends
for mojitos" can find a bartender who knows how to make a good one.
If you think I jest through the fragrant smoke from a Cohiba, you
haven't seen the theatrical release of
Miami Vice, where
undercover cop Sonny Crockett spends an idyllic night in Cuba while
seducing a beautiful Chinese woman with connections to a drug
cartel. The movie retains an appropriately somber tone throughout
most of its run time, but for me the idyll in Cuba conjured images
of
Grease-era John Travolta and Olivia Newton-John
warbling their way through "Summer Nights." This is what those two
crazy kids might have done with a better cinematographer and a
thirst for life at the dark end of the street.
It's not just Cuban exiles who despise Castro and his cult of
personality. In a July 24 story headlined "Cuban regime feeling
heat from Czechs," Miami Herald reporter Pablo Bachelet
summarized the current climate this way: "Once a
subservient member of the Soviet bloc, the Czech Republic is now
one of Fidel Castro's top foreign tormentors, providing material
and moral support to dissidents, leading efforts to condemn the
island's human-rights record in U.N. bodies and pushing a reluctant
European Union to take a tougher stance on Castro." Czech support
for Cuban dissidents goes beyond badgering the United Nations and
funding clandestine radio broadcasts. This detail could have come
straight from a pitch meeting for a movie of the week, but it
really happened: "Czech supermodel Helena Houdova slipped into the
island and took photos of Cuban slums. Police detained her for 11
hours, but she managed to smuggle out the camera's memory card in
her bra -- creating a media stir in Prague and later displaying the
photos in an exhibit."
''The revolution's watchmen rose up because I was taking
pictures of something they do not like,'' the 1999 Miss Czech
Republic told journalists.
Helena had it right, as almost any Cuban in Miami could tell
you. Sadly, in the tonier parts of New York and Los Angeles, it's
still as though Ricky Ricardo had more 'splainin' to do than his
red-haired wife.
topics:
Trade, Health Care, Hollywood, United Nations, European Union, Communism