(Page 5 of 15)
Walter Pazik br> San Francisco, California /p> p> I enjoyed your piece. As a father with a daughter in Afghanistan, a son-in-law in Iraq and another son going soon I worry a lot, but I know they'll be OK as their buddies are watching their back. However, I fear who is watching America's back? When one of our major political parties seems ready to make "nice" with bloodthirsty killers I fear the worst. It may buy us a little time as Chamberlain did in 1938, but it reminds me about the story of the man who rode the tiger. We all know what happened in the end. Please keep writing and I will do the same in my community to help Americans wake up to the fact we are in danger. br> -- Philip Stanley , Col. USA (Ret) /p> p> TRAITORS br> Re: Christopher Orlet's The Anti-War Warriors : /p>While I agree wholeheartedly with Mr. Orlet's main premise, I must disagree with his statement that "...even in the darkest days of the Vietnam War there were no public rallies in support of the North Vietnamese or the Viet Cong."
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.