The American Spectator

Reader Mail

(Page 8 of 13)

I have one question. Who among his critics is willing to have their past toughly probed and stand condemned based on such a low requirement of evidence? How many had fathers, for example, that once had used a derogatory term for a minority, and then once used the same term themselves? Would they be willing to be condemned as racists on that basis alone?

I think not.

p>And rightly so, because it is an unfair standard. Any person deserves the right to be judged on whole of his life's actions in such a case, not an isolated instance. What is happening here, says a great deal more about the Gibson's detractors, than about Gibson himself. br> -- Scotty Uhrich br> Glyndon, Minnesota /p> p> AS JED SAID br> Re: Jed Babbin's Democrats' Danse Macabre : /p> p>From Jed's mouth to God's ear! br> --

topics:
Taxes, Foreign Policy, Education, Bill Clinton, Economics, Sports, Religion, Islam, Abortion, Hollywood, Law, Military, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Africa, Communism, Fascism, Oil