America: From Freedom to What? Civilian hostages. Coral depths. Politically held tongues. Pool hall romances. Plus more.
p>
RUSSO'S CHILDREN
br>
Re: James Bowman's review of
America:
From Freedom to Fascism
:
/p>
p>I read James Bowman's article pertaining to the movie "America:
From Freedom to Fascism" and was disappointed in his review and
conclusions. Although I have not personally seen the movie, I have
read a summary of its content and am one of the nuts he describes
in his articles. I became one of these nuts several years ago when
I became thoroughly discussed with our income tax system and
wondered how we imposed such a horrendous system on ourselves. I
researched this all the way back to the founding of the country and
discovered that the Founders made it extremely difficult to impose
a direct tax on the people mainly due to the fact that it would
lend itself to the political corruption that we see today. Another
thing I found interesting is that a graduated income tax and
central bank were included in Karl Marx 10 points to communism. I
think if Mr. Bowman would do some research and just look at the
freedoms we have lost in this country and increasing power of the
Federal government in my short life time of 56 years he might come
to some of the same conclusions as Mr. Russo.
br>
--
James W. Clark
, CPA
br>
Greenville, North Carolina
/p>
In his movie review, "America: From Freedom to Fascism," James
Bowman claims that convicted tax protester Irwin Schiff and
conspiracy nut Aaron Russo are working under the theory that "there
should be no intermediary, no one entitled to such a position by
knowledge, experience, or authority, who stands between them and
the plain sense of the law." Bowman traces this idea to what he
calls "Protestant fundamentalism."
In my opinion, it is simply false to trace the "no judicial
intermediary" theory to the Protestant idea that the Bible doesn't
need a priestly class to provide interpretations of it. That's
either pro-Catholic opportunism on Bowman's part, or else
anti-Protestant bigotry. Opposition to the tax laws is not a
"Protestant" issue and this is the first I've ever heard such a
claim. Tax rebels usually tend to follow nullification or
interposition theories, which can be traced back to (ironically
enough) James Madison, and also to Thomas Jefferson (not so
ironically). The Civil War pretty much put an end to such ideas.
For a critique of tax protestor arguments, please see the IRS
site.
p>On the whole, however, I agree with Bowman's critique of
conspiracy theories. The nuts on both the right and left hold to
the idea of covert causation in history, and both are equally
anti-American, witness the title of Russo's movie.