By James Bowman on 7.21.06 @ 12:02AM
Repellent and loathsome.
Like its title, Nick Guthe's film, Mini's First Time,
is an elaborate joke at the expense of the idea of youthful
innocence. Remember that? The film takes a hint from Nabokov's
Lolita and retells essentially the same story but with the
child -- a child grown prematurely cynical from living in the
Hollywood snake-pit of wealth and ambition -- as the corrupter of
grown-up innocence. Of course I mean innocence in relative terms.
Alec Baldwin's Martin has at least some residual sense of what it
means to be a father and thus just a smidgen of guilt when he
starts sleeping with his high-school-aged stepdaughter, Mini (Nikki
Reed). Mini herself, however, having long since ceased to be a
child in any but the technical sense, has no idea at all of
traditional family relationships. She hates her mother, Diane
(Carrie-Anne Moss), an unstable drunk and failed actress whom she
addresses as "mommy" only with contemptuous irony.
Diane, in turn, hates Martin, whom she taunts as "dickless
wonder," and regards Mini with indifference. Martin is just a man
to Mini, and her view of the world is that all men are there for
her to manipulate with sex -- as she seems to have been born
knowing how to do. Martin, Mini notices, has just enough decency
left to be shocked when she proposes that they kill Diane. So she
is able smoothly to shift gears and, pretending to have been
joking, propose instead that they just gaslight mom so as to have
her committed to an asylum. We are left to infer Mini's expert
calculation of precisely what is required to salve Martin's
vestigial conscience, and how many times in the course of their
relationship she has to make similar calculations.
There are no prizes for guessing that the ultimate end this
moral monster has in her sights is not exactly the Humbert-and-Lo
idyll that gives Nabokov's hero his own saving touch of innocence
and pathos. The working out of her elaborate plot to get what she
does want makes this a tightly-constructed thriller that offers
some of the same satisfactions as old-fashioned noir
pictures. But noir was long ago divorced from the sense of
sin and malign fate that created it and dragged into the sunlight
-- specifically the all-forgiving Southern California sun -- where
it has never quite managed to retain its old imaginative power.
Mini's First Time ends with Mini's voiceover saying:
"And in case you're feeling guilty about having no one to identify
with but me, relax. There's a first time for everything." It would
be a good post-modern joke, except that it is so obviously untrue
-- another ironic jest, like "Mini's first time." For at least a
decade, Hollywood has been titillating itself with its own
naughtiness in the same way, and decades before that abandoned the
old Hays Code, which decreed that "the sympathy of the audience
should never be thrown to the side of crime, wrongdoing, evil or
sin." Even without that rule, there's the unwritten rule that
somebody, even if it's a criminal, must engage the
audience's sympathies. Or, as Mini says, encourage us to "identify"
with her.
But Mini's pride in the cinematic uniqueness with which she
repels such self-identification ignores the fact that Neil LaBute,
Todd Solondz and Kevin Smith have been working this rich seam of
moral guano ever since (at least) Smith's Clerks of 1994
or Larry Clark's and Harmony Korine's Kids of 1995. A very
similar trick to Mimi's was pulled off by John
McNaughton's Wild Things of 1998. Similarly, the idea that
childish innocence no longer exists, or perhaps should
exist, was the thesis of Cruel Intentions (1999), which
had its own recent imitator in Brick, earlier this
year.
Like all those films, Mini's First Time glories in its
own wickedness -- or, as the literary theorists would say,
"transgressiveness." Ten or a dozen years ago, that was still
shocking, at least to ordinary movie audiences. Now it has become
just another mannerism or, like conceptual art -- the cross in
urine, the dead sheep, etc., -- a way of laying claim to membership
in the artistic vanguard. But beyond its own ambition, I think
there is a truth-claim in such movies. Also like conceptual art,
they advance the cynic's claim that disgust, whether physical or
moral, is an infallible guide to what they commonly call "reality."
In the same spirit, the magazine called Shock, which
features photos of rotting corpses and the like, advertises itself
with the ostentatious cry: "Welcome to the Real World!" Real? Why
is ugliness and grossness more real than beauty and purity? The
answer is not self-evident. But the fashion for disgust as a moral
and aesthetic touchstone remains as strong as ever.
That's of course always presupposing that we are still capable
of disgust, as it appears Mr. Guthe is not. Like the comedian who
has learned to remain straight-faced while telling a joke, he
tosses off the appalling Mini with the air of insouciance of one
who imagines that the world is full of moral Minis who are only
less clever than his own perversely beloved creation. "The film,"
he says in his Director's Statement, "is simply a reflection of the
America we live in today." Well, he would say that, wouldn't he? I
don't believe it. Mr. Guthe may love Mini's cleverness and
wickedness. But he doesn't really believe that she represents
anything like moral reality. That's an affectation. What he really
believes is that this is what movie audiences now want to be told,
which they probably do. And the more they are told it, the truer it
will become.
topics:
Hollywood, Movies