(Page 5 of 18)
br> Re: The Washington Prowler's Surrender at Treasury and State : /p>There's no word to describe it other than "betrayal," pure 'n simple. Bush in virtually all of his actions (or inactions) 'cept the tax cut issue -- and, some were advocating "Condi for President"?
Give me a break.
And to call this "Wilkinson's ability to shape a message" some kind of positive in that (prior to Tony Snow) totally inept White House, that's just gotta be somebody's idea of crazy!
Again, it's sick. And that miserable excuse for a president (and too much of his staff) has been the biggest disappointment I can recall; never expected much from Carter, nor Clinton either. But this complete Bush administration betrayal has me about ready to bolt for Brazil, a land where (thank God) they've never even heard of Political Correctness... or so it seems.
No, the only two options I'd even consider voting for in '08 are Rudy or Joe. Not sure why, but I trust 'em both. Call me an old fart if you like, but that's something I really haven't been able to feel since Barry Goldwater.
p>Hell, come to think of it, I wish Dubya would resign and let Dick Cheney take over for the remainder of their term -- got more faith in him than in his "boss." br> -- Jack Frost /p> p> MEXICHUSETTS
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.