The American Spectator

Buy the Book

What's in a Word?

By Florence King on 7.14.06 @ 12:08AM

This review appeared in the June 2006 issue of The American Spectator. To subscribe, click here.

Manliness
by Harvey C. Mansfield
(Yale University Press, 304 pages, $27.50)

THE DEFINITION OF SHEER JOY is the reaction of a conservative on learning that a book entitled Manliness has just been published.

As soon as I heard about it I began churning out promotional copy in my head: "From the 300 Spartans to the men of the Titanic.... What women REALLY want: 'I could not love thee, dear, so much, loved I not honour more.'"

Next, I mentally wrote the jacket copy.

"...that prototype of self-discipline, the Color Sergeant in Zulu."

"...warfare as minuet: the polished courtesies observed by gentlemen officers Robert Mitchum and Curt Jurgens in The Enemy Below."

"...the mutual respect that springs up between the hunted white man and his African pursuers when he wins the test of manliness in The Naked Prey."

"...the chivalric ideal displayed at West Point in 1861 when cadets from Union states presented arms as their Southern classmates marched off the field to the strains of 'Dixie.'"

"...Undying admiration: Coriolanus and Custer."

"...Forgotten manliness: the nameless English soldier who fashioned a cross for Joan of Arc from the wood of her pyre."

These are just some lump-in-the-throat examples of manliness that I expected to find in this book, but Harvey C. Mansfield, Harvard professor of government, delivers nothing but a lump, the fatal kind that metastasizes whenever the faculty lounge and the University Press join hands and lock jaws.

Instead of pumping us up, he tells us everything we've always wanted to know about Plato's presentation of thumos in The Republic; women and akuron in Aristotle's Politics; virtu in Machiavelli ("To be altogether bad you have to be good at being bad, thus good"); Nietzsche's nihilism, Hobbes's Leviathan, and Rousseau's philosophy of education as set forth in Emile, all couched in a prose style guaranteed to cure insomnia in ten minutes. Trying to follow Mansfield's sentences is like trying to keep your hood ornament on the white line during a snowstorm. To wit:

Epictetus displays Stoicism in its pure form, unadapted to politics (as distinct from Cicero's adaptation), hence completely irresponsible: don't get involved is the lesson. It reminds us of the manly confidence (Chapter I) that remains aloof and does not seek to take charge of risky emergencies....

Canceling all that subjugation requires overcoming the relevant powers of nature, or, in sum (and for the sake of being sure), deny nature....

Now, of all the possible virtues, or parts of virtues, manliness seems most to illustrate virtue by not being either in one's interest (narrowly understood) or defined by principle.

Mansfield's thesis is that manliness still exists whether we like it or not, and that most of us do not like it because it threatens the gender-neutral society we have so carefully constructed. Ours is a society in which one slip of a pronoun can rouse suspicions of sexism; a society that prefers role models to heroes, weakness to strength, and guilt to pride in order to fashion the "incentives" that encourage us to become rationally controlled citizens. The rationally controlled society, says Mansfield, "fears courage more than fear," and so does everything it can to "encourage and compel behavior conspicuously lacking in drama."

Letter to the Editor

topics:
Education, Trade, Business, Law, Africa