The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Special Report

The Death of Shamil Basayev

How the late jihadist leader began as a swashbuckling separatist.

(Page 2 of 2)

br> But Basayev was eventually transformed into a brutal, humorless warlord who appeared to have less interest in Chechen independence than in furthering the international jihad. It is always difficult to speculate on the cause of such wrenching personal changes, but certainly the Russians’ killing of his family looms large. In May 1995, Russian attacks reportedly killed eleven of Basayev’s relatives, including his wife, two daughters, and a brother.

After the June 1996 Russian withdrawal from Chechnya, Basayev lost his bid for the Chechen presidency but was appointed prime minister. Little more than a military commander, Basayev was unsuited to this job and became politically marginalized. It is around this time that he drew close to Khattab and other jihadist figures that had flocked to the country. Most Western analysts view the alliance between Basayev and the jihadists as a marriage of convenience rather than a genuine religious transformation on Basayev’s part. But then again, most Western analysts understand neither theology nor religious conversion and so needlessly downplay them as salient factors.

Even if Basayev’s conversion to radical Islam was a fraud, his terrorist attacks carried out in its name were tragically real. Basayev is linked to large number of major terror attacks. The best known is the Beslan school massacre in 2004, in which over 1,200 people were taken hostage. More than 340 were killed, with children comprising over half of the victims. Another prominent incident is the October 2002 Dubrovka theater attack in Moscow, in which Chechen rebels took over 800 theatergoers hostage. When Russian special forces attempted a rescue, 129 hostages died — most of whom were killed by the narcotic gas the Russians used to knock out the rebels.

THE PARALLELS BETWEEN BASAYEV’S LIFE and the fate of his beloved Chechnya are striking. Basayev’s shifting goals from Chechen independence to the promotion of pan-Islam mirror the shifting objectives of the two wars. And just as the Russians’ treatment of Basayev’s family and his people seemingly drove him into the arms of the jihadists, so too has Russian callousness in pursuing the second Chechen war driven many Chechens toward solidarity with the terrorists.

There are many lessons to be gleaned from Basayev’s life and the Chechen war as a whole. One clear lesson, reflected in both Basayev and the Chechen people, is how wars that are brutally executed can play into the jihadists’ hands. Another lesson is that, while the Chechen mujahideen should clearly be seen as an enemy of the U.S., we should be careful about how we engage nation-states like Russia in the global war on terror. Though the Russians did not initiate the second Chechen war, their brutal execution of the conflict has played one hundred percent into the terrorists’ hands.

Page:   12

topics:
Islam, Military, Iraq, Russia, Oil

About the Author

Daveed Gartenstein-Ross is a senior consultant for the Gerard Group International LLC. His first book, My Year Inside Radical Islam, will be published in Winter 2007 by Tarcher/Penguin.

Letter to the Editor

Related Articles

More Articles by Daveed Gartenstein-Ross

More Articles From Special Report

http://spectator.org/archives/2006/07/14/the-death-of-shamil-basayev

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT