The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Another Perspective

Not All the News Is Fit to Print

In the spirit of "Loose Lips Sink Ships," the administration should undertake a PR offensive against the press's release of classified information.

(Page 2 of 2)

Narrator (a familiar and distinguished voice, perhaps that of Kelsey Grammer, Tom Selleck, or Rudy Guiliani): The freedoms we have in this country are worth protecting. We defended them against fascism and Nazism during the Second World War and against atheistic communism during the Cold War. Among these liberties are the freedom of speech, religion, and the press. But when a newspaper publishes classified information that benefits terrorists, that newspaper endangers these liberties and puts real lives at risk.

Just as there is no freedom to extort, defraud, slander or defame, even though one may use speech to do so, there is no liberty to publish classified information that will help those who want to destroy liberty.

In World War II, the U.S. government published posters that warned its citizens, "Loose Lips Sink Ships." It is no different today. When well-intentioned people, including newspaper reporters, publish the details of our secret operations, they put in danger all of us, and they make another September 11 more difficult to stop.

So, remember that loose lips sink ships, and not all the news is fit to print. Please be careful if you think you know something about any aspect of our war on terrorism that would help those who want to hurt America.

Our lives, and our freedoms, depend on it.

I CAN EASILY IMAGINE OTHER commercials and public service announcements that include citizens and military personnel who explain how the administration's secret operations have worked to protect them, their families, and millions of people around the world. Such testimonies could have a powerful impact on helping the country to understand that the publishing of classified information on the acquisition of intelligence is deadly serious business, and that those who willfully ignore the gravity of the situation are aiding and abetting the enemies of America and its liberties.

Rather than waiting for the New York Times or the Los Angeles Times to strike again, the administration should act preemptively. This would shift the terms of the debate and force the mainstream media to justify their actions to a public adequately informed of its real-life ramifications.

Page:   12

topics:
Mainstream Media, Television, Business, Religion, Constitution, Military, Communism, Fascism

Letter to the Editor View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by Francis J. Beckwith

More Articles From Another Perspective

http://spectator.org/archives/2006/06/30/not-all-the-news-is-fit-to-pri
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Middle-Aged Man Takes a Holiday

Christopher Orlet | 2.9.12

ADVERTISEMENT