By James Bowman on 6.21.06 @ 12:02AM
A depressing delight for anyone loves doing crossword puzzles.
Patrick Creadon's Wordplay is a delight for those who,
like myself, enjoy doing crossword puzzles. It's also depressing.
This is because so much of it takes place at the annual Crossword
Tournament in Stamford, Connecticut, and we get to watch as people
who are impossibly good at solving the New York Times's
most difficult puzzles show us what duffers we are by comparison.
Starting out as a documentary about the Times crossword,
its current editor, Will Shortz and some prominent people who are
addicted to it, the film soon loses focus on anything but the
tournament, in its account of which it offers us a classic sports
movie scenario. We meet the various contenders for the title in
their homes, learn a little bit about them, and then follow them to
the climactic confrontation in Stamford.
Everyone will have a favorite to root for, and the championship
round -- in which the three finalists stand on a stage, each with a
felt-tip marker and a blow-up of the same puzzle on an easel, and
the first to finish it without mistakes wins -- is a real
nail-biter. The three are Al Saunders, a middle-aged family man who
works for Hewlett-Packard in Colorado, Trip Payne, a young gay man
from Ft. Lauderdale, and Tyler Hinman, still an undergraduate at
Rensselaer Polytechnic who, if he wins, will be the youngest
champion ever. In addition, we meet several past champions -- who
tend to be musicians or mathematicians -- lesser competitors and
others who come to the tournament every year because they feel part
of the competitive crossword-solvers' "family." One woman says her
husband died at the tournament in 1981, and she keeps coming back
because it makes her feel closer to him.
The movie's account of the tournament continues to be
interspersed with information about the Times's crossword
and interviews with celebrity crossword solvers, including Bill
Clinton, Jon Stewart, Ken Burns (all of them left-handers, we
notice), Mike Mussina and the Indigo Girls, as well as compilers of
the puzzles like Merl Reagle, whose composition of one for Mr.
Shortz as we watch is as impressive in its way as the feats of the
lightning fast solvers. You will learn some of the rules of puzzle
composition that you may not know, such as that a sixth of the
squares must be black and that the pattern of black and white
squares must be symmetrical. There is also the "Sunday morning
breakfast test" which rules out any answers that refer to bodily
functions.
I would have liked to see the documentary part of the film cast
its net a little wider -- for instance to show us the equally
amazing people who solve the cryptic, British-style crosswords that
I prefer, where "flower" (probably) calls for the name of a river
(a flow-er) and "shaken" (almost certainly) signifies that the word
before or after it is an anagram. These require rather different
skills from the American puzzles which are more dependent on
general-knowledge and make the words play less puzzlingly and less
frequently. But for anyone who has ever spent any time being
frustrated by the New York Times crossword, which is most
of us, this film will come as a treat.
topics:
Sports