Yes, Virginia, or no? More UN Nitti-gritti. More pity politics. Plums much else.
p>
THROES OF DESPERATION
br>
Re: Brendan Conway's
A Test for
"Fighting Dems"
:
/p>
p>If James Webb is rejected by Virginia voters, it will have been
Webb's courageous stand on racial preferences that did him in.
Webb's first non-fiction book,
Born Fighting
, reveals that
his ancestors in the south share the socio-economic status of
African Americans from the region; hence, Webb's question, why
racial preferences for all but whites who are presumed by the
nation's elite to be rich? That is too much for those Democrats who
make a profession out of their race; Jim has been reviled for his
truth telling. More than the rejection of an anti-Iraq war hero, a
Webb loss will demonstrate that pander politics remains the essence
of the Democratic Party.
br>
--
William Perry Pendley
br>
Evergreen, Colorado
/p>
p>
Wow! What an oxymoron! The party of Franklin D. Roosevelt would
disown these loonies. Agree or disagree, Mr. Roosevelt's Democratic
Party was one of ideas, service and determination. Today's
democrats (they are not deserving of capitalization) are the party
of surrender, victimhood and subservience to government. They have
a generational solution to the almost complete lack of service
performed by their ilk (remember Donna Shalala -- We can be glad
our best and brightest did not serve in Vietnam) they run the only
two or three veterans young enough not to be drooling in their
stool softener. Mr. Dean, you are indeed in the insane throes of
desperation to win an election. That's not democracy. Democracy
somewhere must resonate with "for the people," not just for the
Democrat Party.
br>
--
