(Page 6 of 16)
br> "Charlie Company" br> 2nd Bn. 18th Infantry br> 1st Infantry Division br> Republic of Viet Nam br> Class of 67 br> "Our Cause Was Just" /p> p> Back in August 2004 when I was writing on behalf of the Swift Boat Vets, I wrote in this piece : br> /p>Think about this: John Kerry had to know that his fabrications were ultimately unsustainable and that the men he falsely condemned would not remain silent were he to run for the presidency. Yet he has ignored that reality and attempted to build his whole campaign on his wartime service and his questionable awards. It would be interesting to hear what a psychiatrist might conclude from such bifurcated reasoning. Which brings us, unavoidably, to this question:br> Additionally, in response to a piece I have just written for The American Thinker hereDoes this sound like the kind of judgment we want in a Commander in Chief in this time of terror?
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.