So those Iraqi mobile bioweapons labs, or weather-balloon hydrogen plants, or EM-50 Urban Assault Vehicles, or whatever they were, are back in the news. The Washington Post suggested that when President Bush declared that they were biological weapons factories, he was ignoring an expert report arguing that they were not, in fact, WMD-related. Several blogs (e.g., here, here, here, and here) jumped on the Post to point out that buried within the Post’s article is a note that a joint CIA/DIA report identifying the trailers as biological weapons factories arrived the next day.
The Post article describes the report as “unequivocal in its conclusions” that the trailers were not bioweapons labs, and mentions the report being written by “a secret fact-finding mission to Iraq — not made public until now.” Later on, the Post describes two teams of military experts looking over the trailers as well.
Curiously, on June 7, 2003, the New York Times had already described three teams looking over the trailers in Iraq. Two of the teams were in agreement that the trailers were WMD labs, but the third, more senior team was not at all “unequivocal,” but “divided sharply over the functions of the trailers.” Given that the dissenting experts with “direct access to the evidence” whom the Times quotes were both British and American experts, and the Post also describes the secret team as being made up of “nine civilian U.S. and British experts,” the Post’s scoop on the “secret” third team is looking less, well, scoopy, and more like a rehash of information mostly in the public domain for nearly three years. (See also George Gooding at Seixon.com, who got the scoop on the Post’s non-scoop.)
In any case, over the course of 2003 consensus moved toward the conclusion that the trailers were hydrogen plants, and not bioweapons labs, and the 2004 Duelfer report ultimately embraced the finding of the “secret” technical team.
SCOOP OR NOT, I’M GLAD the story came up again. The whole incident left a nagging question that has bothered me for years now: if these vehicles were just innocuous balloon-juice factories, why were the Iraqis so scared of them?
Flash back to February 5, 2003, when Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the U.N. General Assembly about Iraq’s WMD program. He played audio of an intercepted phone call between an Iraqi Brigadier General and a Colonel, dated November 26, 2002, and showed slides of their transcribed conversation:blockquote>COL: About this committee that is coming… br> GEN: Yeah, yeah… br> COL: …with Mohamed El Baradei [Director, International Atomic Energy Agency] br> GEN: Yeah, yeah. br> COL: Yeah. br> GEN: Yeah? br> COL: We have this modified vehicle. br> GEN: Yeah. br> COL: What do we say if one of them sees it?
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?