By James Bowman on 3.14.06 @ 12:02AM
James Carville a representative of American imperialism? Political junkies will love it regardless.
The subtext of Our Brand Is Crisis, a riveting
documentary by Rachel Boynton about the American political
consultants who helped elect Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, popularly
known as Goni, as president of Bolivia in 2002 goes something like
this. American-style political campaigns in which candidates are
marketed like soap or hamburgers are inherently corrupt in
themselves and, when imposed upon a Third World country like
Bolivia, a form of American imperialism. Leaving the substance of
these contentions to one side for the moment, we may notice that
they depend absolutely on what happened to Goni's presidency in the
aftermath of the election. If his presidency had been as successful
-- and in other circumstances it easily might have been -- as his
campaign, this film could not have been made.
The point is that its failure had nothing whatsoever to do with
the clever marketing strategies of James Carville, Tad Devine and
Jeremy Rosner of the Greenberg, Carville, Shrum consultancy in
Washington that won the election campaign for him. Their success
was owing to a carefully focus-group tested advertising campaign
designed to split the anti-Goni vote -- which everyone agreed was a
substantial majority of the electorate -- between the populist Evo
Morales and the Latin strongman-type, Manfred Reyes Villa, who was
the early favorite. This they did by concentrating their fire on
Sr. Reyes Villa by stressing his military background and hinting at
corruption in the amassing of his personal fortune. Of course, this
strategy could not have succeeded without the peculiarity of the
Bolivian electoral system, which allows the winner of a plurality
in a multi-candidate race to take home all the marbles, even though
he wins (as in this case) with only 22 percent of the vote.
So maybe the blame for Goni's disastrous presidency should be
laid at the door of whomever designed the Bolivian constitution
rather than Mr. Carville and Co?
Anyway, Ms. Boynton's own success in making a very taut,
verite-style campaign thriller -- at least for political junkies --
has nothing to do with her attempt, unsuccessful in my view, to add
significance to the story by clucking her tongue about the evils of
political marketing. To her credit, she herself makes it clear that
Goni's spectacular failure was unconnected to the campaign. Instead
it was owing to his politically ill-judged decisions to raise taxes
on the poor and to export Bolivia's gas through a Chilean port.
Above all, it was made inevitable by the machinations of the nasty
demagogue, Evo Morales, in whipping up the popular paranoia
directed against America in general and Goni's American accent and
connections in particular. This rabble-rousing clearly had a lot to
do with the deadly riots which caused the president's resignation
and flight to the U.S. only 14 months after his election.
Granted, the American-style manipulation of public opinion is
not a pretty sight, but it is the way democratic politics works,
more or less, the world over. The old aphorism about sausages and
politics being the two things you don't want to see being made
inevitably comes to mind. But the really ugly -- and, by
the way, violent and anti-democratic as well as anti-American --
campaign is that of Sr. Morales, representative of the Bolivian
coca growers and now the newly-elected president of his country.
Making that point, however, is no part of Ms. Boynton's purpose.
Presumably it has no resonance with the American cinema audience,
which has come to expect the Americans in these situations always
to be the bad guys. Like the political consultants she so harshly
criticizes, therefore, she's only telling her audience what it
likes to hear.
topics:
Taxes, Constitution, Military