By R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. on 3.9.06 @ 12:08AM
Your average Hollywoodian won't be too happy sitting through a screening of Obsession, a new documentary on Islamofascism.
WASHINGTON -- Darn, I missed the Oscars again. I adore gory
spectacles. If cockfights were legal I would be there. Even
bear-baiting would not be too gruesome for me. Yet somehow I always
miss Oscar night.
The evening sounds fascinating. Primitive forms of life are
gathered under one roof to strut and to preen. They whoop. They
giggle. They sob. Occasionally one of the more cerebral intones a
metaphysical ponderosity -- generally lifted from a bumper sticker.
America's Hollywood animals may be vulgar, but they are
humanitarians too. During Oscar night they espouse more
humanitarian blah than can be heard at the United Nations General
Assembly in a month. Then the assembled shove off into the night
for "party-time" and the next day's glad and glorious morn: the
rehab session, consultations with a local swami, a court-ordered
anger management session, a liver transplant, or perhaps just a
tummy tuck. The Hollywood community has about as high an incidence
of social pathologies as any slum, albeit higher self-esteem.
If I missed Oscar night, my colleague Ben Stein did not. Stein,
an occasional frequenter of the Hollywood scene, reviewed the
evening's glamorous proceedings for The American Spectator
online and noted,
"[T]here was not one word of tribute, not one breath, to our
fighting men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan or to their families
or their widows or orphans."
And Stein went on: "No doubt the men and women who came to the
Oscars in gowns that cost more than an Army Sergeant makes in a
year, in limousines with champagne in the back seat, think they are
working class heroes....They would be heroes if they said that
Moslem extremists are the worst threat to human decency since
Hitler and Stalin." Now wait a minute, Stein, mixing Stalin in with
Hitler is not going to play with the Hollywoodians. By their lights
Stalin was a progressive. Hitler was a brute racist. Hollywood has
always been conflicted about Stalin. About Hitler there is no
ambivalence. He was a very bad fellow, notwithstanding his
abhorrence of tobacco and his vegetarianism.
Perhaps we could get Hollywood on our side in this war against
Islamofascism if the Hollywoodians could be apprised of the
Islamofascists' enthusiasm for Hitler. A week or so ago I sat in on
a screening of a new documentary that is pretty convincing on the
matter, Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West.
Information on it can be found at obsessionthemovie.com.
The documentary is very graphic. It shows the treachery of the
Islamic brutes, bombed buildings in such places as New York,
London, and Madrid. There is film footage of innocent people being
slaughtered in Western cities. More illuminating, there are the
interviews with angry imams elaborating on specious complaints
against the West. In less formal settings we see the turbaned
scholars delivering angry rants before vast throngs of hysterical
followers. And towards the end of the documentary there are shots
of another angry leader in a smartly tailored uniform bellowing his
complaints before throngs of equally hysterical followers. The
venue is Nuremberg and the speaker is Hitler. He is addressing the
Nazi faithful before they brought all Europe and Germany to
ruin.
Obsession, is one of the most riveting films I have
seen about the roots of the struggle the civilized world now faces.
The film establishes that those roots are in fundamentalist
readings of the Koran, but it adds another seedbed, Nazism. In the
1930s, though Osama bin Laden's forbearers were not Aryans, they
were welcomed to Germany by the Fuhrer. His agents visited them in
the Middle East. Both proclaimed the same goal, the elimination of
the democratic West and the Jews.
Naturally Obsession includes footage of Winston
Churchill warning of the Nazi threat. It is stirring, but it is
also melancholy. At one point the great Churchillean scholar, Sir
Martin Gilbert, is asked by one of the film's interviewers about
what made Churchill a great leader. To the amazement of viewers
Gilbert responds that Britain's wartime leader viewed himself not
as a great leader but as "a failure." Throughout the 1930s he had
not been able to rouse his countrymen to the threat of Nazism. The
consequence was catastrophe. In an age when Islamofascists could
send nuclear-armed suicide squads out into the West we could face
still more catastrophe, if the West is not roused.
topics:
Islam, Hollywood, Iraq, United Nations, Fascism