Abnormal thinking? It's symptom, side effect, and cause of America's love affair with psychotherapy.
THERE IS ALREADY no shortage of reasons to join the tens of
millions of Americans taking Paxil or its generic counterpart,
paroxetine. As we shall see, side effects range from the hapless
hiccups to grand mal seizure. But we're now told that the
hit anti-uncomfortableness drug raises the risk of harm to others
beside ourselves, in the form of birth defects: "Pregnant Women Warned By FDA to Avoid Paxil."
Specifically, your Paxilated baby is overly likely to develop like
a diseased clump of swiss cheese, with "holes and malformations in
the chambers of the heart."
Of course, as the Washington Post takes pains to point
out, "the defects often heal on their own, and more severe cases
can be surgically repaired." Well. Goodness knows we wouldn't want
the fetal needs of our children to get in the way of -- what? What
does Paxil treat? Oh, a whole host of things: really, everything --
Depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Social Anxiety
Disorder (they won't allow the acronym SAD), Panic Disorder,
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), and Posttraumatic Stress
Disorder (PTSD). GlaxoSmithKline, well aware that what they're
selling is simply a serotonin bomb, suggests that the hydra of
neurosis Paxil treats exceeds"everyday shyness" or "the normal worry and
anxiety we all face."
But then GSK reveals the full scale of our national spaz-out
pandemic -- Depression: 16 million sufferers yearly; GAD, 5 million
a year; SAD, 12 million; Panic, 3 million annual victims; OCD, up
to 5 million over their lifetimes, and PTSD, up to 16 million at
some point before they die. Fortunately for our mental census, GSK
assures us that "many people have an overlap of these conditions."
But even subtracting out a million sufferers from each disease to
ensure nobody's counted twice, the figure reaches over 50 million.
That's one of four Americans between the ages of 15 and 64,
and the reader knows as well as this writer does that the kids and
the elderly are often not exempt from pharmacotropic
manipulation. Indeed, rarely have they the freedom to opt
themselves out.
LET'S CIRCLE BACK to the side effects -- on what exactly 1 of 4
Americans (a conservative estimate) ought to roll the dice in
exchange for the benefits of Paxil (yet to be described). The list,
for those courageous enough to slog through it, is massive, appearing to embrace the known universe of
ailments. But let's enjoy a few representative highlights:
James Poulos is a doctoral student at Georgetown and the former Political Editor of Culture11. His writing has been published by The American Conservative, The National Interest, The New Atlantis, Partnership for a Secure America, and The Weekly Standard. In addition to AmSpecBlog, he has blogged at The American Scene, Doublethink, and Postmodern Conservative, which he founded. With degrees in political science and law from Duke and USC, he is currently at work on a dissertation about life after Napoleon. In his spare time he anti-blogs at Pish Tosh.
Nathan| 2.24.09 @ 11:08AM
So I guess u are not very approving of paxil, is this because of your own experience?