According to sources with ties to third-party groups opposing
the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Samuel
Alito, the Knight Ridder newspaper analysis of Judge Alito’s judicial record — which ran
in many of the papers operated by KR — mirrors analysis that was
pulled together by staff of People for the American Way, Alliance
for Justice, and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, all
groups that are coordinating their anti-Alito efforts.
“The analysis and cases are similar to what we pulled together
in the first week of the nomination. Some, but not all of the same
cases, that kind of stuff. You don’t have to be a legal scholar to
know which cases to focus on,” says a PFAW source. “I don’t know
how widely disseminated our efforts went, but I know we shared it
with reporters in Washington and New York. Our people very much
wanted to get it out, but not sourced to us.”
That a paper would attempt to analyze or evaluate a Supreme
Court justice’s record isn’t surprising. Nor is it surprising that
a paper’s reporters would use an outside group for assistance.
Reporters regularly coordinate their stories around special or
exclusive access to sources and embargoed reports. And reporters of
all ideologies depend on leaks and off the record and on background
leads.
In the Knight Ridder article, the reporters wrote, “Although
Alito’s opinions are rarely written with obvious ideology, he’s
seldom sided with a criminal defendant, a foreign national facing
deportation, an employee alleging discrimination or consumers suing
big businesses.” The rest of the story is structured to support
their thesis.
Last week, the Senate Democratic leadership allowed
third party groups opposing Judge Alito to use a room in the Hart
Senate Office Building to provide background and on the record
interviews with reporters the groups felt would be sympathetic to
their cause. Republicans and conservative journalists were barred
from the room.
“You read the KR article and as a stand-alone, it’s no big deal.
A law school student could write this up,” says a Republican Senate
Judiciary Committee staffer. “What bugs us is that you have the
left-wing groups spreading the same kind of stuff and this looks
very much like an organized smear campaign.”