By Jay D. Homnick on 10.31.05 @ 12:05AM
With the Miers withdrawal, one thing is clear: conservative pundits have more influence than ever before.
The rumors have been confirmed, but Harriet hasn't. Ms. Miers
has opted to avoid a hardy battle, sitting instead on her laurel as
a pioneer of Texas jurisprudence. The process was becoming a
comedy, which would have been a tragedy, so she ended the drama,
exiting stage right. Stage right, I say, because she was done in by
squabbles on the right rather than quibbles on the left.
More important perhaps than quickly naming a successor is
repairing the rift in Republican ranks. To accomplish that, the
syndrome must be correctly diagnosed. Sad to report, nothing that I
have read shows signs of having the first clue.
Where to start? Well, with the world championship of baseball
having historically changed sox, we naturally turn for guidance to
baseball -- and hosiery.
Baseball first. Once the St. Louis Cardinals faced a nervous
young pitcher who walked six batters and hit two to start the game.
Pitcher Dizzy Dean came to bat with no outs, bases loaded, and a
5-0 lead. He promptly swung at the first pitch and hit a roller
back to the mound that the poor shell-shocked kid bungled for an
error. Safe at first, Dizzy turned to the first base-coach in mock
indignation: "Not enough that I do all the pitching around here,
now I have to do the hitting too?"
This has been the plaint of conservative scribblers since the
Miers nomination. Not enough that we do all the writing around
here? Now we have to do the governing too?
That may sound terribly presumptuous, but it is a fact that
Republican power in Washington is dependent upon sympathetic
pundits in a way that is quite surprising for the modern world. An
honest sociologist or historian, if there is such a creature, can
find fodder here for a fascinating dissertation. This phenomenon
is, in a word, phenomenal.
The genesis of this was the conquest of the reporting media by
the foot soldiers of the left. Lenin mapped it out, Goebbels
expanded on it, Orwell expounded on it, and by the mid-20th century
it was clear. The capacity of modern technology to quickly spread
information could be exploited. People are more resistant to
opinion than fact. So, cloaking opinion in the garb of fact is a
great tool for subversion. A fellow turns on the television to take
a proper gander at the news, never suspecting that it has been
goosed into propaganda.
The left knows, if only subliminally, that they are competing
against eternal values with ephemeral impulses. In forums that
strive for truth as the highest object, their cause may not be
overwhelmed today, but it will certainly be outlasted tomorrow. By
coloring fact as it is packaged for public consumption, they can
promote their opinions through the ostensible purveyors of
news.
For a time, this stranglehold on the news choked the right into
submission. Then, William F. Buckley, Jr. and R. Emmett Tyrrell,
Jr., later abetted by Rush Limbaugh, showed the way out of the
tangle. They simply began to use the opinion media as an
alternative pipeline for factual information.
Now, some decades into this, the left has almost no opinion
writers of note, because that limb has become redundant and
atrophied. The right, by contrast, offering a multi-faceted role to
its pundits, has developed layers of talented communicators. All
this adds up to an amazing anomaly: the Democrat base gets its
opinion from news publications and shows while the Republican base
gleans its news from opinion journals and programs.
Thus a Bill Clinton can flout the views of Maureen Dowd, Richard
Cohen, and Molly Ivins, without paying a price, as long as his spin
doctors offer a palatable version of events to be marketed as news.
But, when George W. Bush proffers a nominee that insults the
intelligence of my colleagues, he comes very close to sawing off
the branch that serves as his perch. The writers are happy to let
the elected do the governing, but they must maneuver within the
range of the defensible.
Which brings us on a run back to hosiery. A fellow comes down to
breakfast. His wife points out that he is wearing one blue sock and
one black sock. He goes back to his drawer, puts on the next pair,
comes back down, wife checks again; sure enough, one blue, one
black. Disgustedly, the guy mutters: "Darn that maid. That's the
second time she did that to me today."
The danger with bad nominations is that they usually come in
pairs. Let's hope that the administration can put some spine into
their governing so we can get the whine out of our writing.
topics:
Bill Clinton, Television