(Page 3 of 14)
I can only hope that someone Bush brings in will understand the porous border problem and will at least stick a finger in the dike to stop the flow.
p>If we had all the money back that these "independent counsels" have cost it would sure help the budget. br> -- Elaine Kyle /p>This may be overly optimistic but it may be a very good thing for Fitzgerald to wrap up his investigation and actually show his cards. Obviously the White House is performing at a very low level right now, probably because of dealing and worrying about Fitzgerald's investigation. Maybe once the actual target(s) have been identified, the White House can get on with its business in a more professional way.
Even if Rove is moved out of the White House, he can still participate via video teleconference. In fact, here comes some heresy, maybe the White House would be a little more principled and a little less calculating if Rove did not participate in every decision. Bush is not going to ever run for president again so why is it important that Bush do the politically correct thing? Maybe he should just listen to his conscience more and Rove less.
p>The down side is that Laura will have more influence and that is probably not a good thing. br> -- Steve Koch /p> p> WHOSE GUESTS? br> Re: Shawn Macomber's Dark Lords and Vegetables
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.