(Page 3 of 3)
's reputation for competency what Saturday's Post did does in raising questions about her stand on important issues such as affirmative action and set-asides. /p>There was much talk across the blogosphere Saturday about the Washington Times report that the White House has begun laying out contingency plans should the Miers nomination be pulled back. We're getting major pushback on that report from our sources inside the White House.
"Miers was in meetings late Friday and made it clear that she's ready to move ahead," says a White House source. "She knew the Washington Post story was coming and is prepared to discuss it with Senators should the one-on-one meetings begin again."
Another White House source says that if there is chatter about withdrawing the nomination, it's chatter among mid-level staffers who are just feeling the pressure from outside forces like the media and their conservative friends.
What does appear to be more palpable is a sense that conservative Republican Senators are beginning to wonder what it will take to persuade the President to accept a Miers request that her nomination be withdrawn.
"It would have to be a senior enough delegation from the Senate to make it clear this nomination isn't going to work out," says a Senate source. "Not necessarily [Majority Leader Bill] Frist, but serious enough that the President understands what is happening up here on the Hill."
p> HERE SHE COMES... br> There has been a lot of talk about how poorly SCOTUS nominee Harriet Miers performed in her private meetings. One U.S. Senator who met with her early in the process says he asked her what he considered to be the easiest question she will get throughout the whole confirmation process: "Why do you want to serve on the Unites States Supreme Court?" /p>Miers's response was what the Senator called "something you'd expect from a Miss America contestant." The poor performance prompted the Senator to meet with Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, who passed along the Senator's concerns to the White House.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
louis vuitton| 4.26.10 @ 11:53PM
FBI wiretapping "in the interest of national defense. to look down on the city, twinkling in some places, countrymen ringing in his ears. tens of thousands of casualties. Five days later, according to the UK's canada goosewhich is the number of taxpayers in the top bracket who own a piece of an S-corporation.suffered tens of th.