9.29.05 @ 12:01AM
WEEPING FOR DOLLARS
Re: George Neumayr’s The Crying Game:
Since the United States is a nation of victims, and over half is taking medication for one mental disorder or another, it goes to show the rest of the people who are at least somewhat sane and not a victim of something that pity pays big bucks. It’s like a child who cries and looks up to an adult with those big pitiful teary eyes and quivering lips; who can say no to such a pitiful scene? The only twist to this is that adults have now perfected this on demand emotion.
This nation has turned into a nation of jelly-kneed whining wimps, on-call clinical psychologists, 24-hour pharmacies, and crisis centers. There was a time when Americans were tough, independent, hard charging, and possessed of nothing-is-going-to-stop-me mentality, but now that Americans realize that, “Hey, this crying have pity on me thing, really does pay big bucks.” The bigger the tears, the bigger the payday is now the rule of the day. Former vice Presidential candidate John Edwards from North Carolina has perfected the, “doe-eyed stare” to such a fine art there is no jury in this country that could refuse such an expression of emotional anguish, and it has paid handsomely.
Look at the Katrina soap opera; it was a complete open field to see mainstream media trying to out-victimize each other. One reporter would say that there was sporadic looting, then a different reporter would report all of downtown New Orleans was on fire, and at least 10,000 dead were stacked like cord wood along the boulevards, and then the next reporter would further report that babies who took refuge in the Super Dome were being ravaged by rapists. It is as if they were monitoring each others’ broadcasts, playing the game of victimization one-upmanship.
Fox News reporters Shepard Smith and Geraldo Rivera were laying the crocodile tears on so thick that the viewers just needed to go to the bathroom and wretch from the pathetic made-for-TV emotions. “General Hospital” couldn’t have even made this stuff up. But, we must remember that it’s all about TV ratings and TV ratings mean big money.
Madison Avenue, drug manufacturers, clinical psychologists and
the media have turned a private emotion into a billion dollar a
year industry. Excuse me; my palm pilot is reminding me to take my
— Melvin L. Leppla
Jacksonville, North Carolina
The scenario of these Louisiana crooks and dysfunctional
politicians should get the attention of Mel Brooks who might be
able to fashion a very funny movie from their shenanigans. The
title could be “Criers Are Liars” or maybe “Louisiana Lullaby.”
— Howard Lohmuller
Mr. Broussard’s version of the tragedy would make a better movie.
Maybe in the movie version, Sean Penn will get there in time. Condi
Rice will be giving music lessons to President Bush who couldn’t
help because he needed more practice on his fiddle.
— Danny Newton
IF YOU WANT IT, COME AND GET IT
Re: Ralph R. Reiland’s A Flow of Free Money:
Let’s see. The Federal Government passes out debit cards for
$2000 to persons displaced by Katrina and we are (what? shocked,
surprised, indignant?) that some of this money found its way into
the Louis Vuitton store and/or Houston strip clubs? I would have
been shocked if these things hadn’t happened. Given the
caliber of the recipients, what did we think they were going to do
with the money? Buy groceries? I wonder how many of those cards
were swapped on the street corner for crack, nose candy, or
— Keith Kunzler
Rather than $250 billion, we should give Louisiana a couple of
trucks full of beads. They seem to want the things, and we would
get flashed for years.
— David Govett
SEE YOU IN HEL
Re: James G. Poulos’s Ego Tripping at the Gates of HEL:
Your article has a good point, spending for spending’s sake does not make sense. One could say the same for FEMA credit cards and Louis Vuitton handbags. But the factor you did not touch on is the effect of disruptive technology. That is a technology that is so upsetting that the entire universe before it is blown away. The airplane, lasers, a space ribbon, and possibly HEL’s are all analogs of this effect.
HEL’s for example have a couple of advantages if perfected. Like a $20,000 laser shot from the ground downing a $2 billion B-2 bomber. Line of sight targeting making ‘see, shoot, kill’ a near certainty. Deployment years in advance of use with no attendant worries about degrading contents of the artillery shells or rocket fuel tanks. Such a system essentially eliminates manned combat flight in any theatre where such a system is deployed. No commander would risk his pilots or resources in any subsequent engagement when the first strike never comes back.
If a country was able to develop HEL’s for $5 billion in R&D and deploy for another $10 billion strictly for air defense the payback might be substantial. The cost of the B-2 bomber at around $50 billion dwarfs in comparison and goes in the trash heap. The new F-22 and its use cost would escalate as the sole mission left to it would be high altitude missions, not wanting to risk such craft on ground attack roles in an HEL infested environment.
For the U.S. such a development would be a disaster. Our current Air-Sea-Land concepts depend heavily on mastery of the air space early in the engagement. Made more urgent by the numerical inferiority of U.S. ground forces in some theatres. Any adversary capable of denying the U.S. airspace dominance has a fair shot of an even match slug out in a protracted ground-based battle.
As a possible disruptive technology HEL’s have a lot going for
— John McGinnis
James Poulos’ September 27 article “Ego Tripping at the Gates of HEL” raises legitimate concerns about the development and spread of directed energy weapons (DEWs). However, Poulos overlooks the most salient feature of DEWs, which is that they are first and foremost mass blinding weapons. Such weapons will be cheap, easy to manufacture, and totally devastating in their impact. One can imagine what al Qaeda or some other terrorist group would do with such a device.
That being said, Poulos is naive to assume that we have the
option to pull the plug on DEW development. Several major powers,
including China, have active DEW programs, and the logic of
deterrence demands that we move forward.
— Jonathan Schlein
James G. Poulos’s article provides an interesting point of view — provided one has the time to unravel the tangled delivery. Ironic that he deplores the development of a workhorse-type space vehicle (the current shuttle) moving on to explore Mars, but then deplores the development of new weapons technology wishing instead for refinements of current systems because it would be more “stable.”
It is good to debate before spending the money. The line from
“Jurassic Park” reference spending millions to determine “can” you
do something without spending any time debating “should” you do it
comes to mind. However, after reading the article I was left
wondering — has Mr. Poulos ever humped a rucksack, carried a
weapon, or even worn a uniform (Boy Scouts don’t count) in his
life? It may be a sad commentary, but new weapons will be designed,
new technologies will be explored. Quantum advances are referred to
as a Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA). An example of this is
Precision Guided Munitions (PGM). Following Mr. Poulos’s logic,
these weapons would never have been developed because of their
ability to “destabilize.” Wars are not intended to be fair fights.
The object is to win, not just participate.
— Pat Collins
FREE MARKET HIGHWAY
Re: Bill Whalen’s Tunnel Vision:
A true conservative would never have written such an article,
unless they were given some bad information. As the one who
developed this concept, let me first say that one of the strongest
proponents of the Tri-Tunnel has been Bob Poole of the Reason
Foundation, hardly a liberal or liberal/big government
organization. Secondly, there was no factual information even
remotely describing the pay as you go system, planned to date
entirely with “private money” and designed to be financed
“privately.” Finally, any comparison to the “Big Dig,” a government
boondoggle, is purely fictitious and shows that the author did
little, if any, research. If he had he would realize that the Big
Dig was a government-financed project in a liberal state through a
developed area and was basically a “cut and cover” project. The
Tri-Tunnel goes under a mountain whose base is volcanic rock. The
ground rock (ground by the use of giant boring machines similar to
those that bored three tunnels 32 miles under the English Cannel in
three years) is conveyored to rail cars and then sent by rail to
the Los Angeles ports, sold to the ports for their planned
expansion. The multitude of users that need such a tunnel (water,
power, fiber optic lines, etc.) all pay rent for the capacity
provided. This along with auto and truck tolls make the system
feasible. The government agency that controls the parallel toll
lanes on the 91 freeway charges $7.75 one way toll to cover less
than nine miles of travel. Would competition be a good thing
— Bill Vardoulis
Re: Ben Stein’s A Big Lie Put to Rest:
I have lived in Baton Rouge for 48 of 56 years. I was born in Tangipahoa Parish. I am white. My teenagers and I worked tirelessly for almost a week in evacuation shelters, churches, and on the side of the road handing out bottled water to stranded motorists, much of it at my own expense.
However, I am now done with it. These ungrateful people have invaded our city, our stores, our restaurants, crowding up our roads so that my once 12 minute ride to work now takes 30-40 minutes, we are waiting sometimes several days just to get normal everyday prescriptions filled, waiting in lines we’ve never had to wait in before, can’t find the make-up I’ve worn for 40 years and never had a problem before, they are using our resources, clogging down everything that has made this city work for years, and I gave up a week of my hard-earned vacation time to risk disease and God knows what to help these ungrateful little beggars and I AM A RACIST?!!!!!!!
I am done with them. No more time, no more money, no more
resources from me or mine will they get. I only have to have my
hand bitten once by the dog I’m trying to feed to realize that I
don’t need this. Many, many, many of my friends and acquaintances
are beginning to feel the same way, and are backing off with their
support. If the government is going to be stupid enough to keep
giving and giving and giving with no accountability at all, these
guys are never going to get off their lazy rears to do anything for
themselves, except continue to have as many children out of wedlock
they can sire and carry. If the media wants to paint this as
racism, paint me walking away with a bloody stump of my hand that
was holding out the food and water.
— Judy Turner
The people susceptible to the Big Lie have no idea who Josef
Goebbels is, which means 95% of Americans.
— David Govett
Right on Ben!
Those hollering “racism” were quick to believe that the Black refugees had turned into murderers, child rapists, bloodthirsty beasts shooting at rescuers, had 200 bodies stashed in the basement, and even had regressed to cannibalism, even before using up the supply of MREs.
It was the leftist media, and the leftist Democrats who accepted
these false allegations without question. What does that say about
the activist’s opinion of the black population? It’s a sobering
— G.B. Hall
…I know I will no longer tolerate Mr. Stein’s despicable
— Elizabeth Gentry
Re: Rick’s letter (under “Direct Hit”) in Reader Mail’s Hurricanes and Race:
Rick is entirely correct in what he said concerning the President’s poll numbers. But this does not contradict what Mr. Stein said in his article.
Presidents G.W. Bush and Richard Nixon share many of the same problems, the most notable being press hostility that was unprecedented either before or since Nixon. The press does shape public opinion, to a great extent, and this is reflected in polls.
It must be remembered, however, that Nixon was brought down by an internal scandal (Watergate) that has not arisen in the Bush administration, even though the MSM has gone to incredible lengths to either find one or fabricate one.
The current administration began on a historic note, but it will
end on one of mediocrity. The only thing that can turn the tide is
for it to regain its focus and forget the social agenda.
Concentrate on what has made it great, an uncompromising approach
to the physical security of the American people. It is just a bit
too early to feel secure.
— Michael Tobias
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
AMSPECBLOG POST OF THE DAY
Re: “Right Reminders,” posted by Al Regnery at 11:50 a.m. on Sept. 28, 2005 on AmSpecBlog:
It seems to be to be the case that “GOP” and “Conservatism” have
less and less in common these days. Reagan was the last great
Republican and conservative, in my book. And yes, I miss
him. He was a statesman, instead of a politician, who saw the world
in real terms, and not utopian ones (which both Democrats and
Republicans are guilty of these days). Where have all the statesmen
— Mark Pettifor
Sign up for our weekly newsletter:
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
By John Corry
By Mark Steyn
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
By Mark Steyn
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
By Brit Hume
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online
The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.
Copyright 2013, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.