(Page 6 of 16)
/p> p> I am astonished at the masochistic tendencies of so many liberals. The pain they seem to suffer from the writings of Messrs Stein and Neumayr appears to drive them into more irrationality than is normal even for them. Why do they continue to read TAS? Could it be that, in the words of a great Arizonan, "In their hearts they know we're right"? br> -- Charles Dana /p> p> Absolutely wonderful. I'm forwarding to everyone I know. Thanks. br> -- unsigned /p>I will circulate Ben Stein's article to everyone I know. It's a concise indictment of his intellectual and moral vacuity.
p>Most absurd is that he devotes two of his 13 "points" to essentially repeat that "Bush did not cause this hurricane." Who has accused the President of that? No one. What Bush has been rightly accused of is a monumentally slow response to a disaster. Every President faces such tests and Bush has failed. It's really not hard, Ben, unless you lack the courage to face "the truth." br> -- David Mott br> Cookeville, Tennessee /p>
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.