The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

TAS Live

The Little Engine That Could…Undo Darwinism

Unlike President Bush, the critics of Intelligent Design theory can't accept that its proponents are making scientific, fact-based arguments.

(Page 4 of 6)

KAZDNHF OPZSJHQL ZXFNV
br> is complex in a certain sense, because that exact pattern is highly unlikely to be produced by chance. If my computer keyboard could type only capital letters and the space character, there would be 27 characters that could go in any “slot” of the sequence. The total number of unique sequences of characters that could be produced would be 27 multiplied by itself 22 times, or 27 to the 22nd power. That is a very large number. Expressed in powers of 10, it is more than 10 to the 31st power (10^31); that is, 10 with another 30 zeros behind it. To give an idea of the size of that number, fewer than 10^18 seconds have elapsed since the universe began about 20 billion years ago. If we wrote a program to run on a supercomputer that would generate random strings 22 characters long, and our supercomputer could run through a trillion tries every second, the odds would still be against producing this exact sequence by chance in 20 billion years. The fact that it’s very improbable to produce this precise sequence by chance is another way of saying, in information theory, that it is highly complex . p>The third criterion is specification. Here’s another 22-character sequence: br> /p>
THE AMERICAN SPECTATOR
br> When we see this sequence, we conclude without a moment’s hesitation that it has been produced by a fine intelligence. Like the gibberish sequence of the same length, it is complex because it would take more than those trillion tries a second over the history of the universe to produce it by chance. It is also specified in relation to a pre-existing standard or function; in this case, the rules, spelling, and vocabulary of the English language.
Page: ‹ First   2 34 5 6  

topics:
Education, Religion, Environment, Books, Law, Supreme Court, NATO

About the Author

Dan Peterson is an attorney who practices firearms law in Northern Virginia. 

Letter to the Editor View all comments (23) |

Tom Roncarelli| 12.15.08 @ 4:47PM

Great article about the truth!...Genesis rules!..simply because the King of Kings predestined it to be thus!...To the Father's Glory!
Romans 1:20
Dan, many thanks for your plain speaking, much of which I completely agree with.

Ken Malley | 3.5.09 @ 1:37AM

I can't understand how anyone can study micro biology and see the complexity and still entertain any belief in evolution. It is time the whole dishonest claims blew up into full public debate and outrage at what our children have been taught and the damage it has done, depression hopelesness leading to all types of crime.

htreh| 2.21.10 @ 9:27PM

Tod Converter

Related Articles

More Articles by Dan Peterson

More Articles From TAS Live

http://spectator.org/archives/2005/08/05/the-little-engine-that-couldun

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

Laying Down My Pen

Quin Hillyer | 5.23.13

Lerner's Plea

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.23.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

ADVERTISEMENT