By Ralph R. Reiland on 8.2.05 @ 12:05AM
Public sector Pennsylvania is a national disgrace.
PITTSBURGH -- As it turns out, the price tag on the
middle-of-the-night pay grab
that Pennsylvania legislators voted to give themselves has produced
the most expensive state Legislature in the nation, according to an
analysis by the Pennsylvania Economy League.
With the new pay hike, ranging from 16 percent to 34 percent, on
top of the 5.2 percent cost-of-living pay hike the legislators
received in January, Pennsylvania's taxpayers will pay $20.5
million per year to cover the salaries and benefits of the state's
253 legislators. That's nearly double the $11.9 million annual
outlay that taxpayers in California, the nation's most populous
state, pay for the compensation of their 120 state legislators.
Note that California, with triple the population of
Pennsylvania, i.e., a populace of 35.9 million in California versus
12.4 million in Pennsylvania, manages to operate with less than
half as many state legislators as Pennsylvania.
Texas, the nation's second-most populous state, carries out the
business of state government with 181 state lawmakers who are paid
$7,200 per year -- a total annual cost of $1.3 million to the
taxpayers. In New York, the nation's third-most populous state, the
annual cost to taxpayers of compensation to state legislators is
$16.9 million -- $3.6 million less than the new cost of salaries
and benefits for Pennsylvania's 253 legislators.
Closer to home, Ohio has 132 state lawmakers who are paid
$53,707. New Jersey has 120 legislators who are paid $49,000. In
Maryland, where the Legislature meets for only three months a year,
the state's 188 lawmakers are paid $31,000.
In Pennsylvania, the base compensation for state legislators
after this latest pay grab ranges from $81,050 to $145,553, not
counting the free cars, gas, generous defined-benefit pensions,
fully paid prescription coverage, free dental and vision insurance,
free parking, "walking around money," fully paid life insurance and
long-term care insurance, expense accounts, and the no-receipt $128
daily reimbursement for every day the Legislature is in session,
whether the legislator spends the money or not.
And that's not the end of the self-aggrandizement. By way of a
provision that's built into this year's pay raise, on top of
automatic and inflated cost-of-living increases, lawmakers'
paychecks in Pennsylvania will go up each time the House and Senate
members in Washington give themselves a raise.
Additionally, in order to sidestep the section of Pennsylvania's
Constitution that forbids lawmakers from voting themselves raises
that take effect during their current terms, the politicians will
pocket the new money by use of no-receipt "unvouchered
expenses."
None of the above costs include the price of the legislators'
staffs. Not surprisingly, Pennsylvania is at the top of the pile
when it comes to the number of friends, relatives, and other
assorted helpers the state politicians have added to their
payrolls. With a legislative support staff that's 2,947 strong,
that breaks down to 11.6 staffers per Harrisburg lawmaker. In
Maryland and North Carolina, respectively, the state governments
manage to keep things on track with 4.5 and 1.7 staffers per
legislator. Only New York operates with a larger number of staff
members per legislator than Pennsylvania.
In the 2005-2006 state budget, the cost to Pennsylvania's
taxpayers of the legislative branch, i.e., the salary and benefit
package for the Legislature's politicians and staff and other
operational support, is $462 million. Based on the 77 days per year
the Legislature averages in session, that comes out to $6 million
per day. That's not the cost of roads, welfare, and education per
day -- that's just the price tag for those who are passing out the
money.
By and large, Pennsylvania's overblown and overpaid Legislature
might be less objectionable (and more affordable) if the state's
taxpayers were rolling in money. Quite the contrary, the nation's
most expensive Legislature is being supported by a state population
that ranks 24th among the 50 states in per capita income, 34th in
the median value of owner-occupied homes, and 28th in median
household income.
Chief Justice Ralph Cappy, of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court,
has praised the lawmakers for their "courage" in voting themselves
a raise (and voting Cappy a 14.4 percent salary boost, to
$176,800). State Sen. Patricia Vance has a more down-to-earth take
on how the pay raise is viewed by the public. "I have never," she
says, "been called so many names in my life."
Ralph R. Reiland is the B. Kenneth Simon professor of
free enterprise at Robert Morris University and a columnist with
the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. E-mail him at
rrreiland@aol.com.
topics:
Education, Business, Constitution, Law, Supreme Court