(Page 5 of 14)
say he would recuse himself in cases that conflict with Catholic teachings. br> -- James F. Green br> San Marcos, Texas /p> p> Concerning the mention of Turley's op-ed: Fred Barnes said on "Special Report" Monday night that Durbin's office is denying that the question was asked and answered concerning any offer to recuse due to religion. I don't know how reliable this information is, but it should be looked into before another possible media distortion becomes "common knowledge." br> -- Michael K. Wright /p>Thank you for George Neumayr's excellent article exposing the anti-Catholic bigotry surrounding John Roberts' nomination to the Supreme Court.
It is somewhat delicious to now watch the Democrats redefine what it means to be a good Catholic. Last year their idea of a good Catholic was Senator John Kerry. Now it is John Roberts.
p>Apparently Roberts is such a good Catholic that, unlike John Kerry, his private beliefs will prevent him from being able to do his job properly. What is it that Jonathan Turley and Dick Durbin want us to learn from this? That perhaps there are laws on our books that are immoral? br> -- Mrs. John B. Jackson, III /p>
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.