(Page 12 of 12)
I must write to correct Bob Salomon’s corrective. In a letter re: George Neumayr, Mr. Salomon states that the word “eugenics” refers to the process of “selective breeding” and therefore does not apply to abortion. Selection necessarily implies deselection. In animal husbandry this includes the culling of unwanted specimens and the sterilization of useful individuals that are not desirable candidates for reproduction. Without deselection, the process is known as “letting nature take its course.”
p>”Eugenics” as a social/political movement absolutely included abortion and forced sterilization in its bag of tools. The practice of eugenics ultimately included the culling (i.e. murder) of humans (adults as well as children) who were deemed “undesirable.” Since it’s far more efficient to kill a born human being than it is to abort a fetus, the economics of the process literally demand it. br> — Tom McAndrews /p> p> TRUMPED br> Re: Lawrence Henry’s Slackers : /p> p>I couldn’t help but feel a bit encouraged by Mr. Henry’s latest fine piece; my present employment “situation” should be set aright quickly, knowing that there are plenty of fine jobs involving only web-surfing and video games. Gotta go; Mr. Trump awaits! br> — C.S. Bolay br> Kansas City, Missouri /p>
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?