The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Public Policy

Boston Bounty Hunters

But where's the money?

The Federal Government has built an incredible money machine in Boston! Aggressive U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan and his equally aggressive assistants have created a uniquely lucrative legal practice in False Claims Act (FCA) cases. Their renowned Health Care Fraud Unit of the Massachusetts U.S. Attorney’s office has (between May 1996 and May 2001), according to the Boston Globe, “recovered $1.54 billion for federal taxpayers, more than 30% of all health care fraud settlements by the nation’s 94 U.S. attorney’s offices.”

That statement was printed before the Unit recovered another $1.561 billion from three more recent cases: TAP Pharmaceuticals in 2001 for $875 million; Bayer in 2003 for a combined $256.5 million, and Warner-Lambert (now Pfizer) in 2004 for $430 million. These three cases of alleged Medicare and Medicaid false claims alone make up nearly half of the $3.225 billion of Department of Justice (DOJ) health care recoveries in those three fiscal years.

This would be a good thing if these big settlements were making Medicare and Medicaid funds whole for their supposed losses and ultimately securing benefits for beneficiaries.

But are they? Let’s follow the money.

Right off the top comes the reward money for the “relators,” the whistleblowers who initiated the legal action. These rewards are hefty: in the TAP case, a former salesman took home $77 million, and a doctor and his clinic split another $17 million; in the Warner-Lambert case, the whistleblower, an employee of only four months, won $26.6 million for his trouble; the family of the deceased whistleblower involved in the Bayer case got $34 million. In all, more than one fourth of the $1.03 billion collected by the DOJ nationwide on health care fraud in FY 2003 went to the relators.

Where does rest of the money go? Thanks to provisions of the FCA added in 1986, whistleblower’s attorneys are guaranteed standard hourly fees and expenses, plus a shot at a multi-million dollar contingency fee. In December 2003, a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article noted that the Boston law firm representing the Warner-Lambert whistleblower had already racked up 6,000 billable hours for three attorneys and a paralegal. The case ended up settling for $430 million. Needless to say, the law firms specializing in FCA cases are cleaning up financially.

After the whistleblowers and lawyers take their share, the government and prosecutors divide up the rest. The first federal mouth that gets fed is the joint HHS/DOJ program responsible for funding investigations and prosecuting these cases — the government’s own lawyers. The U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO), in an April 2005 report, reported deposits in the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control program (HCFAC) of $766 million for fiscal year 2002, and $243 million for 2003. These allocations to HCFAC account for another quarter of the total $1.03 billion recovered from all health care fraud prosecutions in FY 2003.

Half of the amount recovered in the federal government’s fraud program goes to relators and lawyers. The other half of the amount recovered appears to go as restitution to the programs that were defrauded. Unfortunately, this is a little hard to figure out from the HHS/DOJ reports on HCFAC. Besides being typically 4-12 months late, they also do not clearly show how the money is actually credited to various health care programs to “make them whole” for the amounts they were purportedly defrauded.

The “legislative father” of the Act, Senator Charles Grassley, has introduced legislation to require frequent reports — which may provide a clearer sense of the efficiency of the FCA. Since most whistleblower and FCA lawyer bonanzas relate to Medicare and Medicaid fraud, these programs should get paid first. Based on current reports, the FCA effort seems wildly inefficient — crediting only 50 cents on the dollar to the programs — and designed only to enrich whistleblowers and their lawyers rather help the programs or beneficiaries.

Awards to whistleblowers, their lawyers and the government’s lawyers should be limited to $1 or $2 million. The rest of these massive settlements should go directly to the Medicare trust fund and other health care programs. And yes, there should be clear reports of where the money goes after the bounty is collected.

topics:
Health Care, Medicaid, Law, NATO, Medicare

About the Author

Charles G. Hardin is president and CEO of RetireSafe, a grassroots network dedicated to promoting pro-growth solutions to America’s retirement challenges.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (2) |

J Mitchell| 1.25.09 @ 12:46AM

Charles Harding the author of his hit piece on accountability on federal programs, either never learned simple math, or is so biased he could not properly evaluate qui tam actions.
First, the USA gets 100 % of the proceeds.... that is the USA who now has a $ 10 trillion giant red ink hole in its budgets, debt structure(deficit).
The qui tam plaintiff can petition for a % of the proceeds, but it is no more than 30 % of what is collected(goes to USA DOJ first, USA acounts)
He--relator, qui tam person--- had to entered into an agreement to make his lawyers whole, as it is the the private lawyer who financs this law suits for several years, not the DOJ, or people like Janet---asleep at the wheel--Reno.
Also, the qui tam proceeds upon receipt are subject to taxes.
So, if all taxes, all expenses, all lawyer obligations are kicked in the qui tam is lucky to get 5 % of any proceeds,(gross recovery), all despite great risk, and other things like the smears advanced by people like Mr Harding.
Does Mr Harding like illicit crooked rip offs(the booty) to be in the coffers of rip off entities who drain federal accounts ?
No wonder, the USA has amore than a $ 10 trillion deficit, there are some , who are rooting for crooks, mere mouth pieces for bilkers.
Is Mr Harding now all for the subprime bail out clique, digging their claws into some Bail out booty.
It is truly amazing the extent to which some will go to expose federal acounts to fraud, waste and abuse, hardly growth, but more like a prescription for melt downs, and a banking system that is a toxic swamp, overseen by Kooks like Barney Frank, and his ilk.
Please look at the other side of the issues, without all the bias from people like Mr Harding, will you do that American Spestator ?
Mr Harding is with something called Retire Safe.
We saw in 2008, so many crooks targeting retirees to steal their savings, Mr Harding should wake up, and join the real grass roots, fed up with the wave of corruption that is bankrupting America, and it is urged American Spectator get on that cause to; For the sake of the NATION.
The Republic of Debt is in trouble.... troubled assets are created by nutty jokers like Barnie--Fannie Mae --Frank, to ruin the Nation.
Please American Spectator sound the alarm,
the troubled asset game is double trouble--for the entire NATION.

Related Articles

More Articles From The Public Policy

http://spectator.org/archives/2005/07/14/boston-bounty-hunters

ADVERTISEMENT

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

It's.The.Law

Ross Kaminsky | 5.20.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

How Long Is This War?

Jed Babbin | 5.20.13

Downton's Class System -- and Ours

Tom Bethell | 5.20.13

ADVERTISEMENT