By John Carlisle on 6.22.05 @ 12:07AM
Wachovia learns the hard way that its slavery apology didn't go far enough.
Wachovia Corporation's ridiculous apology for its alleged ties
to slavery has backfired.
Chicago City Council aldermen are vowing to strip from Wachovia
a $9.4 million loan to build affordable housing units as punishment
for the bank's supposed failure to disclose that its predecessor
banks were involved in slave-related business deals.
This serves as a warning to other companies that believe they
can buy peace with the slave reparations movement. Wachovia thought
it would be good for business to cave in to the demands of
reparations activists. Now, not only is the company out of a
multi-million dollar contract, it has made itself a fat new target
for lawsuits and shakedowns.
The Council's plan to remove Wachovia from the contract was in
response to a report the bank released on June 1 in which it
disclosed that a total of two banks, out of the 400 acquired or
absorbed by Wachovia since 1781, had some ties to slavery. The
Georgia Railroad and Banking Company owned 162 slaves and the Bank
of Charleston accepted 529 slaves as collateral on loans. In a
statement accompanying the report, Wachovia CEO Kenneth Thompson
said, "We apologize to all Americans, and especially to
African-Americans and people of African descent."
But this did not mollify Chicago politicians. Aldermen charge
that Wachovia lied when it filed an affidavit in January initially
stating it had no slavery ties. Said Alderman Ed Smith, "People
must pay the price for lying and knowing that they're lying.
The problem though is that Wachovia was not lying. Its mistake
was to accept responsibility for business transactions conducted
more than a century and half ago.
Wachovia prepared the report to comply with a municipal
ordinance that requires companies seeking city business to disclose
any past ties to slavery. The purpose of the Chicago law, like
similar disclosure laws in Philadelphia and Los Angeles, is
presumably to set the historical record straight. The corporations
are not supposed to be punished.
The reality -- which Wachovia belatedly discovered -- is much
more ominous. Disclosure laws enable reparations activists to force
money out of corporations through lawsuits or other financial
"contributions." One of the justifications for the Chicago
disclosure ordinance is to get "information as a preliminary form
of discovery in an upcoming lawsuit."
Such lawsuits ignore the fact that slave reparations are without
legal merit. Modern corporations can't be held accountable for
business transactions of the 18th and 19th centuries. Few companies
have records from that period because they are not required to do
so. And many of the corporations targeted by activists, like
Wachovia, have at best a tenuous connection to the firms involved
in the slave trade.
Wachovia should have done the right thing and defended itself
against the immoral claim that contemporary companies are
responsible for business deals from another era. Instead, it chose
to apologize for something it is not guilty of and, in so doing,
has cost itself a lot of money.
Wachovia is paying the price for corporate cowardice.
If the bank wants to do business in Chicago again, it will
probably have to come up with huge donations to reparations
activists.
The purported outrage with Wachovia came not only from
African-American aldermen but also from Eddy Burke, the white
Chairman of the Finance Committee. Burke is a long-time power
broker linked to numerous corruption scandals. A book published
last year titled When Corruption Was King, by Robert
Cooley, described Burke's alleged indifference to the beating death
of a homeless African-American man by white policemen with mob
ties. Commenting on Wachovia, Burke stated, "If they think a simple
apology...is going to be enough, they've got another thing
coming."
Burke is not the only white machine politician playing a
prominent role in the slavery debate. In January, when JPMorgan
Chase made a similar apology, it was announced by William Daley,
who serves as the JPMorgan Chase "Midwest Chairman," a post
apparently created for him. Daley is the brother of Chicago Mayor
Richard Daley.
The cynical involvement of the Burkes and Daleys, on both sides
of this matter, demonstrates that the slavery reparations issue is
nothing but a shakedown, pure and simple.
Wachovia's Thompson has done a gross disservice to company
shareholders. He should have known that apologizing for past slave
dealings would only cause trouble for the bank. When JPMorgan
issued its apology, it also promised to establish a $5 million
scholarship fund for African-Americans. Reparations activists
responded by denouncing the donation as insultingly low.
Thompson is learning the hard way that reparations politics is
not about promoting racial justice; it is about money.
topics:
Trade, Business, Law, Africa