The American Spectator

Reader Mail

Elite of All Evils

5.27.05 @ 12:01AM

THANKS AND NO THANKS
Re: George Neumayr's Tyranny of the Moderates:

OUTSTANDING!
-- Ruth Skidmore
Plymouth, California

I don't get it. From George Neumayr to George Will, and beyond, all except one (Lisa Fabrizio) of the conservative pundits I admire most seem not to recognize the massive win for the President engineered by people such as Senators Graham, DeWine and Warner. (I don't count McCain, Chafee, Snowe, or Collins because I doubt they're smart enough to know what they've done to their fellow liberals across the isle -- nor is their vote necessary to get the President's judicial nominees confirmed, or the rest of his agenda enacted.)

The truth of the matter is that every single one of the President's pending judicial nominees will now almost certainly get an up or down vote; and all will likely be confirmed. This will occur simply by Senator Frist calling each nomination to the floor for a vote, letting the leftists rant a couple days, calling for and getting cloture, and then counting the votes. End of story.

No nominee will have been thrown overboard, nor will any future nominee likely be defeated without an up or down vote because that would require three of the seven Democrat signatories of the deal to join a filibuster, which they are unlikely to do because, as Senator Graham said, the three nominees they have specifically certified as not "extraordinary" in the "circumstances" sense are less (or is it more?) not "extraordinary" than the other five pending. Thus, the seven Democrats (with the possible exception of Klansman Byrd) cannot and will not now permit a filibuster of any of these other five. And, for these very same reasons, a filibuster of any future judicial nominees during this Congress is very unlikely.

The tactic was brilliant, not only because all the President's judicial nominees will now almost certainly get up or down votes, but because the leftists in the Senate have been rendered far less likely to filibuster anything else -- John Bolton's nomination, Social Security reform, etc. Effectively, the radical, Democrat senators have been neutered for this Congress and probably far beyond because, without the filibuster, all they have left are their normal empty rhetoric, lies, invective, and character assassination. That will no longer be enough to accomplish anything except, perhaps, to recruit a "useful idiot" such as a sniveling Senator Voinovich.

Graham, DeWine, and Graham are geniuses and they should be hailed as champions, not vilified as traitors.
-- A. A. Reynolds
Chula Vista, California

I heartily commend your opinion piece in today's American Spectator.

I must, however, ask this question. Are not ALL members of the Senate de facto "elitists"? I do not recall a single Senate campaign that was not dominated by individuals whose net worth exceeded many small countries. I cannot recall when a Senator declined the luxurious office space afforded them on Capitol Hill. I cannot recall when a Senator refused gold-plated health care, limos, or the other perks afforded them by legislative fiat.

It is my firm belief the Senate acts more like a House of Lords. Your comparison to the College of Cardinals is both apt and cogent.

Bravo!
-- Terry Dexter
Pittsboro, North Carolina

"We have kept the Republic." Respectfully, that's tripe. The Senate won. It betrayed us. We the people, our Constitution and our democracy lost.

So we now have rule by judges and rule by 14 Senate elitists -- all who couldn't seem to keep themselves from self-aggrandizing, dissembling rhetoric and getting face-time in front of a camera -- who've chosen to turn their backs on our trust in them to govern on our behalf?

This governance situation is out of control and far beyond being unacceptable. It is tyranny and it is un-American. It must stop.
-- C. Kenna Amos Jr.
Princeton, West Virginia

How come no one mentions Ruth Bader Ginsburg when speaking of, "out of the mainstream" judges. Why don't we recall her?
-- Virginia C. Powers

Letter to the Editor

topics:
Health Care, John McCain, Social Security, Books, Constitution, Law, Supreme Court, Military, NATO, Conservatism, Medicare