By Peter Hannaford on 5.12.05 @ 12:05AM
Blog coalitions are now applying steam heat to a mainstream media that used to be too wise.
Last September, when bloggers deconstructed Dan Rather and
Company over the bogus documents they used to question George W.
Bush's National Guard service, one CNN executive said that a
typical blogger is "a guy sitting in his living room in his
pajamas." He dismissed the blog phenomenon as having "no checks and
balances."
Now, with a dose of irony pointed CNN's way, three much-visited
blogs (web logs) are banding together to form a global news network
and to sell advertising. It's name? Pajamas Media.
The three blogs -- ArmedLiberal.com, RogerLSimon.com and LittleGreenFootballs.com --
are putting together a network of more than 160 blogs which,
according to Roger Simon, a Hollywood screenwriter and one of the
partners in Pajamas Media, will "get in the middle of stories" in
ways that may elude major news organizations. He cites the coverage
of December's tsunami. In many places, bloggers were the first on
the scene, shooting videos and interviewing survivors days before
major news organizations could put teams on the ground.
According to Simon, Pajamas Media wants to put a camcorder and a
laptop computer in the hands of every one of its network affiliates
so they can continue -- and refine -- their trump card, immediacy.
He recently told the New York Sun, "Our affiliates will
have a physical proximity, language and cultural knowledge" that
traditional media may lack.
Nevertheless, the CNN reaction to blog successes is echoed by
other "mainstream" media (called "MSM" in the blog world).
Recently, the Los Angeles Times's media critic opined that
blogs were inferior in coverage because they didn't have multiple
layers of editors going over every story. Glenn Reynolds, whose
Instapundit.com averages 130,000 unique visitors a day and who is
an adviser to Pajamas Media, says, "...it is a tired cliche that
because there won't be newspaper editors at PJM, somehow the
product will be diminished." He goes on, "We do not need four of
five layers of editors to screw this up like they have at the
L.A. Times." He cited as an example of the sort of
coverage they will seek: "...live feeds and middle-of-the-crowd
commentary from the next Beirut demonstration."
The principals in Pajamas Media don't expect a flood of
advertising at first; however, the niche-market quality of most
blogs will make audience targeting attractive to many advertisers
who, when they use mainstream media, are paying for a good many
readers/viewers/listeners who are not prospects for their products
or services.
The Rather and tsunami stories suddenly put blogging on the map
for many Americans. Today, according to Business Week,
there are nine million blogs, with 40,000 more coming online every
day. Nevertheless, a Pew Research Center survey shows that only 27
percent of Internet users read any blogs. While the best blogs are
carefully researched, well-written, and cleanly presented, many
others are poorly written, tendentious, and primitive looking. As
more advertising gravitates to blogs, and especially blog networks,
a brand of economic Darwinism is likely to prevail: the better
sites will prosper; the poorer ones will stumble along or drop
out.
Newspapers, in particular, are worried about the blog
phenomenon. While editorial types rail about objectivity (as if,
for example, the New York Times was objective in its daily
selection and treatment of stories), business managers are closely
studying the continued decline in circulation. For the six months
ended March 31, 814 of the nation's approximately 1,500 daily
newspapers lost circulation, in aggregate, 1.9 percent. The
Washington Post lost 2.7 percent. The New York
Times, Wall Street Journal, and USA Today,
the nation's three largest newspapers, were essentially flat.
Overall, newspaper circulation has been declining for 20 years.
Network television as a primary source of news has been sinking
since the early nineties. In 1993, some 62 percent of Americans
cited it as their primary source. Today it's about 38 percent.
Cable television is now close to 65 percent. The Internet, first
measured in 1996, now accounts for 35 percent. Especially telling
are the demographics for Internet news users: 67 percent are under
50 and 36 percent are under 30. These are the sort of statistics
that can bring on migraines to newspaper and television business
managers.
Why are many people turning to blogs for news? It's partly the
newness, partly the "second opinion" aspect, partly skepticism
about the objectivity of the MSM. How are people finding the blogs
they want? One way blogs are gaining visitors is through RSS,
Really Simple Syndication. This five-year-old system lets the
visitor subscribe to certain blogs or even to key words about
subjects of interest to them. RSS then searches the Internet and
plops the relevant blogs into what amounts to a personalized
website for the user.
The one word that seems most apt in describing blogs as a group
is "freedom." There is nearly infinite freedom of choice and there
is the freedom from homogenized story selection and slant which for
years went from the New York Times to the evening's
network news broadcasts to newspapers, radio, and television in the
hinterland. Amen.
topics:
Mainstream Media, Television, Business, Hollywood