By David Holman on 4.28.05 @ 12:06AM
Al Gore is back -- but unwilling to move on beyond MoveOn.
WASHINGTON -- Al Gore saved this country once already from
attacks on the judiciary, and he'll do it again. That's what he
told a fervent MoveOn crowd yesterday afternoon at a Capitol Hill
hotel ballroom.
Joining the fray over the "nuclear option," Gore took advantage
of his first major appearance since the 2004 election to settle old
scores, condemn alleged threats on the judiciary, and contest
Republican plans to end filibusters of judicial nominations. And in
so doing, the restyled Southern sage accused religious
conservatives of "American heresy."
The former vice president pointed to his magnanimous acceptance
of one particular federal court decision as an example of respect
for procedural justice. In the wake of a "bitterly divided 5 to 4
opinion" with which he "couldn't have possibly disagreed more
strongly," Gore recalled how he conceded the 2000 election.
"Even though many of my supporters said they were unwilling to
accept a ruling which they suspected was brazenly partisan in its
motivation and simply not entitled to their respect," Gore said, "I
went before the American people to reaffirm the bedrock principle
that we are a nation of laws, not men."
Threatening that the demonstrators may not leave the streets
next time, Gore set a new standard for peaceful acceptance of court
decisions. If the justices of the majority in Bush v. Gore
had all been Republican-nominated and confirmed only by Republican
senators, "America would not have accepted that court's
decision."
What is more, violence may not have been averted if those
justices had been confirmed with the rejection of the filibuster,
Gore warned. "Then no speech imaginable could have calmed the
passions aroused in our country."
Though Gore repeated familiar
arguments against the "nuclear option," he substantially raised
the stakes in claiming the essence of America is threatened by the
religious "zealots" who are supposedly behind the plan.
Al Gore presented himself yesterday as the clear-minded Southern
statesman, historian, and philosopher-poseur. Citing every possible
supporter in history, including Aristotle, the prophet Isaiah,
Saint Thomas More, Lord Acton, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton,
George Will and John McCain, he argued that allowing a simple
majority to approve judicial nominations threatens the rule of law,
democracy, and freedom.
Though the filibuster has been used for "devilish purposes,"
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's plan displays "willingness to
do serious damage to our American democracy in order satisfy their
lust" for Republican domination of all government branches. They
seek "absolute power" and "envision a total breakdown of the
separation of powers." He cited as examples quotes from
conservative and Republican leaders threatening action against
activist judges.
The fundamental flaw "of these zealots," Gore said, is "actually
an American heresy... at odds with the founding principles of the
United States of America." The founders' "forbears" came to America
to escape those "who mixed religion and politics." "Right-wing
religious zealotry is actually a throw-back to the intolerance that
led to the creation of America in the first place."
Republicans do the bidding of "right-wing religious extremists
and exceptionally greedy economic special interests," Gore claimed.
Referring to this past Sunday's video telecast featuring Frist,
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, Charles Colson, and
Focus on the Family's James Dobson, Gore said those who claim
"special knowledge of God's will in American politics" also claim
"that those of us who disagree with their point of view are waging
war against 'people of faith.' How dare they!"
FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE his vice presidency, Al Gore was on
Capitol Hill publicly fighting over the issue of the day. Since the
2000 election, Gore has only sporadically recharged his political
relevance. He briefly emerged in mid-2002 to inveigh against the
White House. He teased the press with a media tour that November
before bowing out of the 2004 election. Gore made another MoveOn
appearance in August 2003 with a spirited speech at New York
University. He auditioned as Howard Dean's kingmaker later that
year, but may have sunk the candidate instead. He also sought to
anoint John Kerry, meeting with the presumptive nominee and
emptying his 2000 campaign account into party coffers. Just this
month, he announced his forthcoming cable network.
The relaunched 2005 Al Gore is much like what the late Michael
Kelly observed during the 2002 media blitz: "Gore, the thinker of
big thoughts; Gore, the visionary; Gore, the radical; Gore, the
bold man of the left." This time around he is also Gore, the
Southern statesman, wise from his years in the Senate and back with
a selective Tennessee twang. He is Gore, "one of the most
consequential leaders of our time," as a MoveOn supporter
introduced him. Gore the philosopher-poseur may not may not be
running for president in 2008. Yet more than a few "Gore 2008"
buttons (with the old 2000 campaign graphics) could be spotted
among the faithful (and only one "Clark '08" pin).
Revamped or not, some old habits die hard. His speech had
familiar features: annoyed and overbearing looks, speaking over a
cheering audience, begging the question, and righteous
defensiveness ("How dare they!). Gore is still a one-man debate
squad, arguing every point and working himself into a sweat by the
end of his 52-minute harangue.
But one gets the feeling this is more about Al than the
judiciary. He broached other old battles from leftover Clinton
administration judicial nominees, the war in Iraq, health care,
and, his specialty, the environment. In other words, the same old
Al, shrill and smug. How long before he wears out his welcome
again?
topics:
Health Care, John McCain, Religion, Environment, Law, Iraq, NATO