By Thomas Lipscomb on 4.22.05 @ 12:06AM
Two more reasons to get the U.N. out of the U.S.
President Bush's choice for Ambassador to the United Nations,
John Bolton, caught sanctimonius hell from Democrats in his
congressional appointment hearings for not taking the U.N.
seriously enough. But recent reports from two U.N. agencies don't
make it any easier.
After the devastating accounts of U.N. mismanagement of the "Oil
for Food Program," from both the U.N.'s own internal report under
Paul Volcker and the enterprising work of journalists like Claudia
Rosett and Benny Avni, one might expect the U.N. to have a little
sensitivity to its own vulnerability in this area. After all, these
reports showed Secretary General Kofi Annan's son, Kojo, lining his
pockets as well as U.N. Undersecretary General, Benon Savan,
presumably at the expense of the welfare of the children of Iraq
the funds were intended to feed during the U.N.-approved trade
embargo of Saddam Hussein. And now more U.N. officials appear to be
involved as well.
But the U.K.'s Guardian notes, "A report to the U.N.
human rights commission in Geneva has concluded that Iraqi children
were actually better off under Saddam Hussein than they are now....
Under Saddam, about 4% of children under five were going hungry,
whereas by the end of last year almost 8% were suffering." So, in
case anyone was under the misimpression that the diversion of Oil
for Food funds under U.N. management might have somehow
shortchanged the Iraqi children, the good news is things were 100%
better for them under Saddam with the U.N. program than they are
under the United States liberation of Iraq.
That certainly puts the Oil for Food scandal in perspective,
doesn't it? And what more objective source than a U.N. agency like
the Human Rights Commission? Of course the HRC has primarily
distinguished itself for the last several years by its tireless
defense of Islamofascism wherever it may occur and trashing Israel
and American policies at every opportunity. Ironically, the
principal beneficiary of this report, Kofi Annan, proposed
disbanding the commission last month and replacing it. An
independent panel appointed by the U.N. reported in December that
"The commission cannot be credible if it is seen to be maintaining
double standards in addressing human rights concerns." What better
example of a doubling standard than increasing the nourishment of
Iraqi children under Saddam by 100% over the present?
The writer who carries this dire tale with a straight face is
none other than Terry Jones: "... film director, actor and
Python." So is this some marvelously Monty Pythonesque spoof from
the Daily Onion? Apparently not. His editor at the
Guardian, Albert Scardino, one of those responsible for
the UK letter writing program that desperately tried to persuade
thousands in the battleground state of Ohio to vote for John Kerry
last fall, suffers from an increasingly common form of
Euro-dysbarism, or "rapture of the deep." Shallow American thinkers
like John Bolton rarely experience it. As George Orwell put it:
"One would have to be an intellectual to believe something like
that."
Meanwhile, from the Bologna International Children's Book Fair
comes a breathless press release that the U.N. has introduced a
brand new video game for kids all over the world. The United
Nations World Food Program "Launches 'Food Force' -- The First
'Humanitarian' Video Game.... A plane circles over a crisis zone.
War. Drought. People are hungry. The aircraft goes into a steep
climb before launching its first airdrop of food aid. A truck
struggles up a muddy, treacherous road, and rebels loom. People are
anxious, waiting and food is scarce." Sounds sort of like
tsunami-struck Southeast Asia last December, doesn't it? So now we
know why the U.N. was such an insignificant presence it took four
weeks to show up for the relief effort in Banda Aceh. Everyone was
busy designing a nifty new children's game. Maybe if they play it
long enough, they might learn how to actually do something.
For the present, New York Sun columnist Alicia Colon
had the best suggestion occasioned by New York's double dilemma of
how to site a new sports stadium in Manhattan and how to
rehabilitate the U.N.'s headquarters -- move the U.N. out of New
York and site the new stadium at Turtle Bay. The U.N. already has a
Foggy Bottom of its own in a fog bank full of U.N. agencies just
north across the Danube from Vienna. Let it relocate in the
Unopolis there and leave Americans with games they at least
enjoy.
topics:
Trade, Sports, Islam, Iraq, Israel, United Nations, Fascism, Oil