By Jed Babbin on 4.18.05 @ 12:07AM
While Volcker fiddles, Nick Panagakos burns the bad guys.
For news junkies, this will be a hectic week. By its end,
Catholics may have a new pope, we may have a new UN ambassador, and
both Kofi and his bestest buddy Jacques may suffer nervous
breakdowns. Things are looking up because, while Volcker fiddles,
the FBI and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York
are burning bad guys. Now all we need to find out are the names of
Cooperating Witnesses One and Two, and the high-ranking UN
officials whom they bribed for Saddam.
CW1 and CW2 may be the first people who have earned the
Presidential Medal of Freedom as a result of plea bargains keeping
them out of jail. (CW1 has already pled guilty to being an
unregistered agent of the Saddam government and is cooperating with
U.S. investigators.) They are unindicted co-conspirators --
credited with helping Saddam bribe the UN into setting up the
Oil-for-Food-for-Bribes-for-Weapons scam -- in the indictment of
one of our all-time faves, Tongsun Park of Koreagate infamy.
For those joining us since 1976, Mr. Park was indicted back then
on 36 counts of bribery, influence peddling, and other usual
business on Capitol Hill. The charges were eventually dropped after
he testified in Congressional hearings about his involvement with
dozens of Congressmen, only three of whom were later reprimanded by
the House. (Think of this the next time you hear the caterwauling
about Tom DeLay.)
Just because Saddam is evil doesn't mean he's a dummy. He did
what any good manager would do if he wanted to pay bribes: he hired
an expert. According to the March 21 indictment of Mr. Park
unsealed last week, and the affidavit stating it signed by FBI
special agent Nicholas Panagakos, Saddam paid bribes to and through
Park to Cooperating Witnesses One and Two and to at least two
high-ranking UN officials in order to get the UN to create the
Oil-for-Food program by Security Council in 1996. Just who were
they? Not Benon Sevan, who wasn't yet chosen to run the
Oil-for-Food scam. There would have been no reason to bribe him
before he was chosen to run the scam. Was Annan himself bribed? How
about Iqbal Riza, his chief of staff who later ordered the
shredding of UN documents for the 1996-1999 period, when the
program was first created and run? Someday soon, we should
know.
The bribes apparently continued until 2003 (when Tommy Franks
had something to say about Saddam's future plans) to make sure that
the program was extended beyond its original expiration date. The
indictment says that Park "invested in a company owned by an
immediate family member of a high-ranking UN official money paid to
him from the Government of Iraq in connection" with the bribe
agreement. Park, having agreed to bribe the UN officials for
Saddam, got at least $2 million for himself and distributed
millions in bribes, both in cash and in oil vouchers entitling the
UN officials to collect more millions from the sale of the
vouchers. So how does Kofi respond to the new revelations? By
trying to pass the blame to President Bush and Prime Minister
Blair, of course.
Last week the sagging Annan said, "The bulk of the money that
Saddam made came out of smuggling outside the oil-for-food program,
and it was on the American and British watch." Annan added,
"Possibly they were the ones who knew exactly what was going on,
and that the countries themselves decided to close their eyes to
smuggling to Turkey and Jordan because they were allies." Of
course, nothing the UN did was wrong.
If Kofi's week weren't sour enough, Secretary of State Condi
Rice added to his agony by saying, "It is no secret to anyone that
the United Nations cannot survive as a vital force in international
politics if it doesn't reform." Note to Kofi: reform or die. It's a
great disappointment that we didn't see the appropriate headline in
the New York Daily News, in 64-point type, saying: "Condi
to UN: Drop Dead." Something to look forward to. Almost as much as
the Bolton confirmation, which may come later this week.
THE LEFTIES HAVE MANAGED to delay, but not stop, the nomination of
John Bolton to the UN ambassador's post. Thankfully, and my
apologies to Sen. Hagel, even he and Sen. Lincoln Chafee seem to be
standing with Bolton. If the Dems can't get either of them to vote
against Bolton, or at least abstain, Bolton's nomination should be
reported out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee early this
week. On the floor, it will pass easily. For Kofi and the rest of
the Turtle Bay crime family, it will be as much fun as passing a
kidney stone. Meanwhile back at le domaine, Jacques is
apparently sinking in the congenital contrariness of his own
countrymen.
Ah, how le ver turns. Just a year ago, it was a sure
bet that France -- one of the chief proponents of the European
Union -- would easily pass a referendum on the EU constitution.
Now, as the May 29 referendum approaches, polls show the French
ready to reject it. That led President Chirac to the most desperate
measure. Calculating correctly that the worst thing a Frenchman
could think to do was to help Uncle Sam, Chirac said that a "no"
vote would weaken the EU and benefit the United States. Chirac, in
a carefully scripted "town hall" session with young French voters,
issued that dire warning last Thursday, with little or no effect.
The French may be content with the status quo which, as the Gipper
once said, is Latin for "the mess we're in."
Whether the French vote the EU constitution down remains to be
seen. It's unlikely that they will reject it because without the EU
agriculture subsidy, much of French farming will end. As John
Hulsman of the Heritage Foundation once told me, the EU
agricultural subsidy is "really a sop from Germany to pay French
farmers to sit around, play boule, and do nothing." The
French may just be revolting against ten years of Chiracism or just
emoting for the press. Once they get enough attention from the rest
of Europe, they may pass the EU constitution to keep their
subsidies. You see, that's what it's all about. Like Oil-for-Food,
the EU is an economic scam. The French have too much to lose if
they reject it. And money is what they're all about. Not everyone
in the world is concerned solely with money. From U.S. European
Command and the Joint Staff comes word of new strides in building
the Iraq Coalition.
From a kinda sorta reliable Navy source comes this bulletin from
the Joint Staff quoting one of its lieutenant colonels: "Things are
looking up for us here. Papua-New Guinea is thinking of offering
two platoons: one of infantry (headhunters) and one of engineers
(hut builders). They want to eat any bad Iraqis they kill. We've
got no issues with that, but State is being anal about it." Dr.
Rice reportedly wants to transform the State Department as Mr.
Rumsfeld is doing with the Pentagon. She apparently has a long,
hard road ahead.
TAS contributing editor Jed Babbin is the author
of Inside the Asylum: Why the UN and Old Europe Are
Worse Than You Think (Regnery, 2004).
topics:
Business, Books, Constitution, Iraq, United Nations, Oil